View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: potato ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Captafol did not decrease potato yield .
Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -15.4% in the 1990s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -9.1% in the 2000s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The average yield decrease rate was -7.3% in the 2010s.
Outcomeaverage yield decrease rate e0 Verbatim
e0 “The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater dry root mass was associated with a smaller decrease in tuber yield under drought.
Outcomedecrease in yield e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 e0 “then the dry root mass with the decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1276 e1 “the higher the value of the parameter, the smaller the observed decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1393 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Potato yield tended to decrease at 60 kg/ha sulphur.
Treatmenthigher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “at higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) the yield tended to decrease in potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–620 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield .
Treatmentzinc sulphate and zinc oxide e0 Directionlittle or no decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1953 t0 “potato mop‐top virus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Both infections tended to decrease yield .
TreatmentInfection by S. turgidiscabies e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Infection by S. turgidiscabies and S. scabies delayed emergence, had the tendency to decrease the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–949 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
Qualifierfor every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.