Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: potato ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Captafol did not decrease potato yield.

Treatment
captafole0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Comparator
quintozenee0

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective chemical was captafol, which was as effective as quintozene and, unlike quintozene, did not decrease yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–692
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51

Title

Glasshouse tests of chemicals for control of potato common scab

A. H. MCINTOSH Annals of Applied Biology 1973. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1973.tb01324.x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average yield decrease rate was -13.9% in the 1980s.

Outcome
average yield decrease ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
-13.9%e0
Qualifier
1980se0

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43

Title

Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China

Feng Fang; Jing Wang; Jianying Jia; et al. Ecological Indicators 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average yield decrease rate was -15.4% in the 1990s.

Outcome
average yield decrease ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
-15.4%e0
Qualifier
1990se0

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43

Title

Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China

Feng Fang; Jing Wang; Jianying Jia; et al. Ecological Indicators 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average yield decrease rate was -9.1% in the 2000s.

Outcome
average yield decrease ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
-9.1%e0
Qualifier
2000se0

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43

Title

Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China

Feng Fang; Jing Wang; Jianying Jia; et al. Ecological Indicators 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626

Other claims from this paper (14)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The average yield decrease rate was -7.3% in the 2010s.

Outcome
average yield decrease ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
-7.3%e0
Qualifier
2010se0

Verbatim

e0

“The average yield decrease rate in the 1980s, 1990s, 2000s, and 2010s was -13.9%, -15.4%, -9.1%, and -7.3%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1340
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–43

Title

Dynamic assessment and prediction of potato disaster loss risk in Gansu Province, China

Feng Fang; Jing Wang; Jianying Jia; et al. Ecological Indicators 2024. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112626

Other claims from this paper (14)
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater dry root mass was associated with a smaller decrease in tuber yield under drought.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
decrease in yielde0
Direction
smallere1
Qualifier
dry root masse0

Verbatim

t0

“potato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60
e0

“then the dry root mass with the decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1276
e1

“the higher the value of the parameter, the smaller the observed decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1393

Title

Differences in size and architecture of the potato cultivars root system and their tolerance to drought stress

Krystyna ZARZYŃSKA; Dominika BOGUSZEWSKA-MAŃKOWSKA; Artur NOSALEWICZ Plant Soil and Environment 2017. doi:10.17221/4/2017-pse

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato yield tended to decrease at 60 kg/ha sulphur.

Treatment
higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“at higher sulphur level (60 kg/ha) the yield tended to decrease in potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–620

Title

Effect of sulphur on yield, uptake of nutrients and economics of garlic (Allium sativum), onion (Allium cepa) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) in alluvial soil

DINESH PRATAP SINGH; SEEMA; JAVED ALI; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2016. doi:10.56093/ijas.v86i5.58352

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield.

Treatment
zinc sulphate and zinc oxidee0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
little or no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“zinc sulphate and zinc oxide caused little or no decrease in tuber yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1953
t0

“potato mop‐top virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–71

Title

Field and glasshouse experiments on the control of potato mop‐top virus

J. I. COOPER; R. A. C. JONES; B. D. HARRISON Annals of Applied Biology 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.1976.tb00600.x

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both infections tended to decrease yield.

Treatment
Infection by S. turgidiscabiese0
Interactor
S. turgidiscabiesStreptomyces turgidiscabiese0pathogen
Second interactor
S. scabiesStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Infection by S. turgidiscabies and S. scabies delayed emergence, had the tendency to decrease the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–949
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19

Title

Responses of potato cultivars to the common scab pathogens, Streptomyces scabies and S. turgidiscabies

L H HILTUNEN; A WECKMAN; A YLHÄINEN; et al. Annals of Applied Biology 2005. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7348.2005.040083.x

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.

Outcome
yielde1
Direction
declinede0
Value
2%e0
Qualifier
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites)e0

Verbatim

e0

“declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723
e1

“yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8

Title

A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels

David H. Fleisher; Bruno Condori; Roberto Quiroz; et al. Global Change Biology 2016. doi:10.1111/gcb.13411

Other claims from this paper (16)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.