View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: pepper ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Association author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hairiness of pepper could decrease the loss rate of economic yield .
hairiness character e6 loss rate of pepper economic yield e6 Verbatim
t0 “COMPARISON OF DROUGHT RESISTANCE OF PEPPER WITH DIFFERENT HAIRINESS CHARACTER UNDER DROUGHT STRESS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–98 e6 “hairiness character of pepper could decrease the loss rate of pepper economic yield effectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1131 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower well-water temperature was asserted to directly influence the pepper yield decrease .
Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum e3 Verbatim
e0 “yield of pepper hybrids Cecil F1 and Bianca F1 in the early glasshouse production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–191 e3 “Temperature of well water was lower than the allowed minimum and therefore had direct influence on the yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–785 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect Well-water irrigation decreased pepper crop yield relative to lagoon water. Intervention effect Irrigation water efficiency differed between the two water sources (P<0,05). Association Average fruit weight differed significantly between the two pepper hybrids (P<0,05). Association The two pepper hybrids reacted differently to lagoon and well water (significant interaction). Association Factor year did not significantly affect pepper crop yield in the controlled glasshouse. Intervention effect Well water had higher values than lagoon water for EC, sodium, potassium, calcium, chlorine, magnesium, bicarbonate, sulphate, iron and boron. Observation Well-water irrigation caused accumulation of slime and blocking of sprinklers. Observation Well-water irrigation disturbed soil structure and caused fruit deformation. Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Both rootstocks did not decrease scion vegetative growth, fruit yield or size.
both rootstocks e0 vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scions e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both rootstocks showed good compatibility with the different scions tested and did not decrease vegetative growth, fruit yield or the size of the scions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1362 t0 “pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
GC-222 had the smallest yield decrease versus control at higher salinity, 16.9%.
higher salinity levels e1 control conditions e1 Verbatim
e0 “minimum in GC-222, with only 16.9% reduction ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1223 e1 “percent decrease in yield at higher salinity levels in comparison to control conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1174 t0 “pepper (Capsicum annuum ) genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–109 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing nitrogen within 30 percent did not significantly decrease pepper yield .
reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pepper in Greenhouse ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–96 e0 “the fields did not decrease significantly and the quality could be improved,the contents of VC and soluble sugar enhanced and the nitrate contents decrease d when reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–374 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean meal + polyethylene did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.
soybean meal + polyethylene e4 no significant decrease e4 weed free control e4 Verbatim
e1 “replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891 e4 “There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In both salinity treatments the yield decrease in pepper was due to a strong reduction in mean fruit mass of 42%.
both salinity treatments e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In both salinity treatments, the yield decrease was due to a strong reduction in the mean fruit mass (-42%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–586 t0 “pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–50 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield decrease d significantly as ETc declined.
decrease in ETc e0 Not reported Compound Organ / stage Treatment Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “Depending on the decrease in ETc, yield values also decrease d significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1056 t0 “pepper ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–102 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
One pepper cultivar yield ed 7.38% less than the control, a non-significant decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “the yield of 1 pepper cultivar was 7.38% less than the control, and didn't decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–419 e1 “with Zunjiao No.2 as control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 79–107 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Turkey litter combined with bioplastic or polyethylene mulch did not significantly decrease pepper yield relative to the weed free control.
no significant decrease e4 when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch e4 weed free control e4 Verbatim
e1 “replicated four times in an organic pepper cropping system near Urbana, IL in 2015 and 2016 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–891 e4 “There was no significant decrease in yield compared to the weed free control for turkey litter or walnut shell treatments when combined with either bioplastic or polyethylene mulch or for soybean meal + polyethylene plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1693 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.