View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: peach ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% decrease in irrigation rate had no significant effect on peach yield .
Treatment20% decrease in irrigation rate e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “to investigate the behavior of peach trees under sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–264 e1 “However, for the 20% decrease in irrigation rate, the effect on yield was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1184 Other claims from this paper (5) Association author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The disease decrease s peach fruit yield , quality and storability.
Outcomeyield, a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits e0 Verbatim
e0 “This leads to a decrease in yield , a decrease in the quality and storability of fruits. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–517 t0 “PEACH LEAF CURL OF PEACH ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–24 Other claims from this paper (7) Association author interpretation original result positive projected Claim · model-written summary
Future warmer and drier conditions are expected to decrease brown rot-induced yield loss in historical peach-growing locations.
Treatmentfuture warmer and drier conditions e1 Outcomebrown rot-induced yield loss e1 Settinghistorical locations devoted to peach cultivation e1 Verbatim
t0 “climate change on peach production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–78 e1 “future warmer and drier conditions will decrease brown rot-induced yield loss in the historical locations devoted to peach cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1560 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Potassium dressing partly compensated the peach yield decrease associated with soil lime.
Treatmentpotassium dressing e0 Qualifierto some extent e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In peach, the lime content of soil decrease d the yield but it could be compensated by potassium dressing to some extent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–754 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
tree-height was the relative decrease .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “tree-height was the relative decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–420 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Limited irrigation alone did not decrease peach yield compared with the control crop management.
Treatmentlimited irrigation alone e3 Directionwithout any decrease e3 Comparatorcontrol crop management e3 Verbatim
e1 “carried out on a late ripening peach (cv. California) growing in a typicalMediterranean horticultural area (from southern Italy) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1089 e3 “Compared to the control crop management (hail net coverage, soil tillage and full irrigation), limited irrigation alone was able to slightly increase WUEI thanks to the reduction of water supply without any decrease of yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1660–1884 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The yield gap between systems tended to shrink after year five.
Qualifierafter the 5th year e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield gap between the two systems tended to decrease after the 5th year. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1043 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fruit acidity was also stated to decrease as pruning intensity increased, contradicting the preceding sentence.
Treatmentpruning intensity e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was also a decreasing pattern in yield and acidity which decrease d according to the increase in the pruning intensity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–820 t0 “peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–109 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest iron deficiency may decrease peach eating quality.
Outcomefruit eating quality e0 Verbatim
e0 “This could lead to decrease d fruit eating quality and to a slight improvement in fruit nutritional value. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1016 t0 “Peach ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–70 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Photochemical quenching and chloroplast energy status tended to decrease , without consistently significant differences.
OutcomePSII photochemical yield e0 DirectionDecreasing tendencies e0 Verbatim
e0 “Decreasing tendencies were also noted for the PSII photochemical yield (photochemical quenching, q p ) and in the energy status of the chloroplast (non‐photochemical quenching, q N , and Stern‐Vollmer value, NPQ) although the differences were not always significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1214 t0 “peach leaves infected by Taphrina deformans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.