Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: nectarine ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 65 to 70 mm yield decreased above 800 fruit per tree.

Treatment
crop levelse0
Outcome
65 to 70e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
800e0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the yields of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25

Title

The Response of Nectarine Fruit Size and Midday Stem Water Potential to Irrigation Level in Stage III and Crop Load

A. Naor; H. Hupert; Y. Greenblat; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2001. doi:10.21273/jashs.126.1.140

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 to 65 mm yield decreased above 1000 fruit per tree.

Treatment
crop levelse0
Outcome
yields of 60 to 65e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1000e0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the yields of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25

Title

The Response of Nectarine Fruit Size and Midday Stem Water Potential to Irrigation Level in Stage III and Crop Load

A. Naor; H. Hupert; Y. Greenblat; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2001. doi:10.21273/jashs.126.1.140

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 70 to 75 mm yield decreased above 400 fruit per tree.

Treatment
crop levelse0
Outcome
70 to 75-mm size gradese0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
400 fruit per treee0

Verbatim

e0

“A significant decrease in the yields of 60 to 65, 65 to 70, and 70 to 75-mm size grades occurred at crop levels greater than 1000, 800, and 400 fruit per tree, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1213
t0

“nectarine”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 16–25

Title

The Response of Nectarine Fruit Size and Midday Stem Water Potential to Irrigation Level in Stage III and Crop Load

A. Naor; H. Hupert; Y. Greenblat; et al. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 2001. doi:10.21273/jashs.126.1.140

Other claims from this paper (6)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.

Treatment
T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome
vegetative growthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Qualifier
low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021
t0

“nectarine orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm applied two weeks after petal fall decreased fruit drop in nectarine.

Material
May Firee0
Treatment
NAA (naphthalene acetic acid) at 40 ppm when applied two weeks after petal falle2
Outcome
fruit drope2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present investigation was carried out on 12-year old trees of nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var. nucipersica) cultivar May Fire”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139
e2

“Treatments with NAA (naphthalene acetic acid) at 40 ppm when applied two weeks after petal fall reduced the crop load to the greatest extent and improve the yield of superior grade fruits and increase the leaf to fruit ratio and decrease the fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1740

Title

Effect of chemical thinning, gibberellic acid and pruning on growth and production of nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var. nucipersica) cv. May fire

Rimpika Rimpika; N. Sharma; D.P. Sharma Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2017. doi:10.31018/jans.v9i1.1192

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.

Treatment
T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
without compromisinge0
Qualifier
low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021
t0

“nectarine orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA at 40 ppm applied two weeks after petal fall improved the yield of superior grade fruits in nectarine.

Material
May Firee0
Treatment
NAA (naphthalene acetic acid) at 40 ppm when applied two weeks after petal falle2
Outcome
yield of superior grade fruitse2
Direction
improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The present investigation was carried out on 12-year old trees of nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var. nucipersica) cultivar May Fire”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–139
e2

“Treatments with NAA (naphthalene acetic acid) at 40 ppm when applied two weeks after petal fall reduced the crop load to the greatest extent and improve the yield of superior grade fruits and increase the leaf to fruit ratio and decrease the fruit drop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1740

Title

Effect of chemical thinning, gibberellic acid and pruning on growth and production of nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch var. nucipersica) cv. May fire

Rimpika Rimpika; N. Sharma; D.P. Sharma Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2017. doi:10.31018/jans.v9i1.1192

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.

Treatment
T-A treatmente1
Outcome
crop water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2083
e1

“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021
t0

“nectarine orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.

Treatment
T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
lesse0
Value
43%e0
Qualifier
low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021
t0

“nectarine orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.

Treatment
T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome
total soluble solid contente0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator
the controle0

Verbatim

e0

“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021
t0

“nectarine orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.