View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: grapevines ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The highest nitrogen rate produced the largest decrease in grape soluble solids.
Directionlargest decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the highest rate (112 kg N/ha) resulting in the largest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2175 e1 “soluble solids over C0 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2054–2076 t0 “Grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 Other claims from this paper (17) Mechanism hypothesis original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Resistant rootstocks may slow colonization and thereby reduce Armillaria yield losses.
Qualifiermay decrease the rate of colonization e0 Verbatim
e0 “Resistant rootstocks may decrease the rate of colonization of grapevines in A. mellea -infested vineyards, thereby reducing yield losses from Armillaria root disease. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1517 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sunburn reduced must yield by up to 30%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “causing a decrease in must yield of up to 30% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–922 t0 “Sunburn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–39 e1 “the canopy of 'Verdeca' grapevines grown in Salento, South Italy, was differently managed by sun exposing or shading the bunches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–412 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither maximum photosystem II yield nor its operational efficiency decrease d under the two UVB treatments.
Treatmentthe two UVB treatments e2 Outcomemaximum yield of photosystem II e2 Qualifieroperational efficiency e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–116 e2 “There was no decrease in maximum yield of photosystem II ( F v / F m ) or its operational efficiency ( ɸ PSII ) under the two UVB treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–793 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher summer temperatures are associated with lower grapevine yield .
Treatmenthigher temperatures during summer e1 Outcomegrapevines yield e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
e1 “grapevines yield suffers from higher temperatures during summer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–671 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Both over and under irrigation reduced grapevine yield .
Treatmentover and under irrigation e0 Directiondecrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GRAPEVINE WATER USE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–38 e0 “This study demonstrated the deleterious effects of both over and under irrigation on yield of grapevines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1052 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil electrical resistivity was negatively correlated with grapevine growth and yield variables.
Outcomeplant growth and yield variables e3 Directiondecrease inferred e3 Verbatim
e1 “A grid of equally spaced sampling points was superimposed to the area where vegetative growth and yield data of the grapevines were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–513 e3 “Negative significant correlations were found between ρ and plant growth and yield variables ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–787 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Symptomatic Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines had significantly lower yield by 504.71 g per bush.
MaterialCabernet Sauvignon e0 Comparatorasymptomatic grapevines e0 Verbatim
e0 “Symptomatic grapevines of Cabernet Sauvignon exhibited significantly lower cluster weight and yield compared to asymptomatic grapevines, with a decrease of 504.71 g per bush. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1230 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The four-treatment combination decrease d shot berries in grape clusters.
Treatmentboron + berry thinning + girdling + GA3 e0 Comparatorcontrol treatment e1 Verbatim
e0 “increase in cluster width, decrease in shot berries and berry physical characteristics were also increased especially when tetra combination treatment boron + berry thinning + girdling + GA3 was applied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1186 e1 “control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–849 e2 “Ruby Seedless grapevines grown in a sandy soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 86–132 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Must from symptomatic Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines had higher acidity by 1.54 g/L.
MaterialCabernet Sauvignon e0 Verbatim
e0 “The must from symptomatic grapevines had significantly lower total sugar content, with Cabernet Sauvignon showing a decrease of 51.29 g/L and Riesling Italico a decrease of 23.72 g/L, along with higher acidity in Cabernet Sauvignon (+1.54 g/L). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1543 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.