View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: grape ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
These combinations did not significantly decrease yield .
Verbatim
e0 “without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1025 t0 “Isabella grape variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–510 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Yield may decrease in the hottest Australian grape regions.
Verbatim
e0 “an increase in yield s may be expected in the coolest regions, while a decrease may be expected in the hottest regions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1183 t0 “grape yield s ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water logging and drought made the PSII yield decrease more precipitous.
TreatmentWater stress (water logging and drought) e0 Directionmore precipitous decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress (water logging and drought) led to a more precipitous decrease , indicating an increased sensitivity of Y to the combined stresses ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–829 t0 “grape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Secondary induced shoots did not have a severe yield decrease after the removals.
Treatmentcurrent shoot, flower clusters, and growing lateral shoots were removed e0 Directionnot a severe decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “when the secondary induced shoot germinated after the current shoot, flower clusters, and growing lateral shoots were removed, a stable number of bunches was observed and there was not a severe decrease in yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 951–1163 t0 “Grape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 173–178 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower yield decrease d total acid content of grape.
Treatmentdecrease of yield e1 Outcometotal acid content e2 Verbatim
e1 “with the decrease of yield , the reducing sugar content of grape increased ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–384 e2 “while the total acid content decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–423 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Total phenol content of grape decrease d as yield fell.
Treatmentdecrease of yield e1 Outcometotal phenol content e5 Verbatim
e1 “with the decrease of yield , the reducing sugar content of grape increased ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–384 e5 “The total phenol content decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–864 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower yield increased the sugar-acid ratio of grape.
Treatmentdecrease of yield e1 Outcomesugar-acid ratio e3 Verbatim
e1 “with the decrease of yield , the reducing sugar content of grape increased ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–384 e3 “The sugar-acid ratio also increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–640 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing canes and buds per cane decrease d total yield .
Treatmentincrease in canes/vine and buds/cane e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An increase in canes/vine and buds/cane resulted in decrease in total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–496 t0 “Himrod grape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Foliar application did not decrease the K/Mg ratio to the desirable level.
TreatmentFoliar application e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Foliar application did not decrease the K/Mg ratio to the desirable level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1677–1750 t0 “Grape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Tannin content of grape first increased and then decrease d as yield fell.
Treatmentdecrease of yield e1 Directionincreased firstly and then decreased e4 Verbatim
e1 “with the decrease of yield , the reducing sugar content of grape increased ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–384 e4 “The tannin content increased firstly and then decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–777 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.