View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: basil ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing spacing did not decrease yield per plant in 1989.
TreatmentA decrease of in-row plant spacing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease of in-row plant spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990, but not in 1989 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–646 t0 “Basil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The traditional method without growth stimulators led to a decrease in basil yield .
Treatmenttraditional crop protection method e0 Comparatorapplication of the growth stimulators e0 Verbatim
e0 “The traditional crop protection method used in the basil crop, without the application of the growth stimulators ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1533 e1 “This caused higher weed infestation of the crop and a decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1610–1681 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990.
TreatmentA decrease of in-row plant spacing e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A decrease of in-row plant spacing decrease d yield per plant in 1990, but not in 1989 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–646 t0 “Basil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–53 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Feedback lighting reduced CO2 required for fresh mass yield by 17%.
OutcomeCO 2 required to generate fresh mass yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “delivering a 17% decrease in CO 2 required to generate fresh mass yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1079 t0 “basil at the end of the photoperiod ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–820 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term low EC did not significantly decrease basil yield against control.
Treatmentwater for 3 days e0 Verbatim
e0 “The short-term low-EC treatments, especially, water for 3 days and 0.5 dS m−1 for 5 days, significantly increased the TPC and antioxidant capacity of leaves without significantly decreasing the yield s of basil, compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1231 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Less irrigation reduced fresh leaves and fresh and dry herb yield .
Treatmentdecreasing the irrigation water e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was a decrease in yield and an increase in CWP for fresh leaves and fresh and dry herb by decreasing the irrigation water. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–622 t0 “basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–88 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Absorbents decrease d basil essential oil yield by 19.6–39.5 as reported.
Outcomeyield of the essential oil e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “content (-8.8-13.2%) and yield of the essential oil (-19.6-39.5) in both cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–838 e1 “Absorbents contributed to a slight decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–660 t0 “crops of basil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–81 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize intercropping significantly affected basil essential oil percentage, with a decrease most evident with S.C. 167.
Treatmentintercropping of maize e0 Outcomeessential oil percentage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield of basil and its components as well as essential oil percentage were significantly affected by the intercropping of maize with it, whereas the decrease was evident when intercropped the S.C. 167 followed by T.W.C. 314 and Giza 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1251 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize intercropping significantly affected basil yield and yield components, which decrease d most with S.C. 167.
Treatmentintercropping of maize e0 Outcomeyield of basil and its components e0 Verbatim
e0 “The yield of basil and its components as well as essential oil percentage were significantly affected by the intercropping of maize with it, whereas the decrease was evident when intercropped the S.C. 167 followed by T.W.C. 314 and Giza 2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1251 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rockwool basil growth decrease d significantly above 4 dS m−1 EC.
TreatmentEC values higher than 4 dS m−1 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “rockwool-grown basil plants, which showed a significant growth decrease with EC values higher than 4 dS m−1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1095 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.