View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.
Taxoncereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas t0 Outcomegrain yield (GYLD) e0 Directionincreased or did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216 t0 “cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A trend of nitrate decrease under optimal irrigation was evident.
Settingoptimal irrigation conditions e4 Verbatim
e0 “Seedlings of head lettuce (cultivar Santoro - Rijk Zwaan) were used ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–572 e4 “the trend of nitrates decrease in optimal irrigation conditions is evident ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2808–2882 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The recommended treatment saves about 960 m3 per hectare without a significant yield decrease .
Treatmentirrigate at 1.0 of APE with nitrogen addition as ammonia gas at the rate of 286 Kg ha-1 e0 Valueabout 960 m3 per hectare e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “irrigate at 1.0 of APE with nitrogen addition as ammonia gas at the rate of 286 Kg ha-1 while saving about 960 m3 per hectare with no significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1755 t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain nitrogen accumulation increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.
Taxoncereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas t0 Outcomenitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) e0 Directionincreased or did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216 t0 “cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimal interval fertigation did not statistically reduce economic yield .
Treatmentoptimal interval fertigation e0 Directiondid not statistically decrease e0 Comparatorconventional interval fertigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “the treatment optimal interval fertigation did not statistically decrease the economic yield and fruit nutrition quality of cucumber when compare to conventional interval fertigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–953 t0 “Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “three had nonsignificant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1087 e1 “one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Larval damage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla and O. frit was 19.3% with fertilizers versus 21.6% without, a decrease only at the tendency level.
Treatmentfertilized block e1 Outcomedamage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla Mg. and O. frit L. larvae e1 QualifierOn the average over 2011…2020 year period e1 Comparatorblock without fertilizers e1 Verbatim
e1 “On the average over 2011…2020 year period, in the block without fertilizers, damage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla Mg. and O. frit L. larvae was 21.6%, in the fertilized block — 19.3% ( decrease at the tendency level) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1425 e2 “in the agrocenosis of spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–101 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Optimal interval fertigation did not statistically reduce fruit nutrition quality.
Treatmentoptimal interval fertigation e0 Outcomefruit nutrition quality e0 Directiondid not statistically decrease e0 Comparatorconventional interval fertigation e0 Verbatim
e0 “the treatment optimal interval fertigation did not statistically decrease the economic yield and fruit nutrition quality of cucumber when compare to conventional interval fertigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–953 t0 “Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–136 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat yield was projected to rise 2.5% on average, without statistical significance.
Verbatim
e0 “not statistically significant average yield increase of 2.5% was predicted for spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1502 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing nitrogen fertilisation produced a slight nonsignificant increase in tuber yield .
TreatmentN fertilisation e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An increase in N fertilisation did not lead to an increase in starch yield due to a decrease in starch content and a slight insignificant increase in tuber yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1792 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.