Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.

Taxon
cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peast0
Outcome
grain yield (GYLD)e0
Direction
increased or did not significantly decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216
t0

“cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90

Title

Breeding progress of nitrogen use efficiency of cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas in long-term variety trials

F. Laidig; T. Feike; C. Lichthardt; et al. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2024. doi:10.1007/s00122-023-04521-9

Other claims from this paper (9)
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A trend of nitrate decrease under optimal irrigation was evident.

Taxon
head lettucee0
Outcome
nitratese4
Direction
decreasee4
Setting
optimal irrigation conditionse4

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings of head lettuce (cultivar Santoro - Rijk Zwaan) were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–572
e4

“the trend of nitrates decrease in optimal irrigation conditions is evident”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2808–2882

Title

Yield and quality of head lettuce after 24-epibrassinolide application under optimal and reduced irrigation

Martin Koudela; František Hnilička; Jaroslava Martinková; et al. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 2013. doi:10.11118/actaun201260030093

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended treatment saves about 960 m3 per hectare without a significant yield decrease.

Taxon
MAIZEZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigate at 1.0 of APE with nitrogen addition as ammonia gas at the rate of 286 Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
savinge0
Direction
savinge0
Value
about 960 m3 per hectaree0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“irrigate at 1.0 of APE with nitrogen addition as ammonia gas at the rate of 286 Kg ha-1 while saving about 960 m3 per hectare with no significant decrease in yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1592–1755
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–71

Title

IRRIGATION SCHEDUL WITH DIFFERENT NITROGEN SOURCES AND LEVELS FOR MAIZE PRODUCTIVITY AND SOME WATER RELATIONS

Ahmed Abd El-Hafeez; Samah Bashandy Egyptian Journal of Soil Science 2019. doi:10.21608/ejss.2019.7293.1239

Other claims from this paper (12)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain nitrogen accumulation increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.

Taxon
cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peast0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD)e0
Direction
increased or did not significantly decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216
t0

“cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90

Title

Breeding progress of nitrogen use efficiency of cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas in long-term variety trials

F. Laidig; T. Feike; C. Lichthardt; et al. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 2024. doi:10.1007/s00122-023-04521-9

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal interval fertigation did not statistically reduce economic yield.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
optimal interval fertigatione0
Outcome
economic yielde0
Direction
did not statistically decreasee0
Comparator
conventional interval fertigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment optimal interval fertigation did not statistically decrease the economic yield and fruit nutrition quality of cucumber when compare to conventional interval fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–953
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–136

Title

Effect of Optimal Daily Fertigation on Migration of Water and Salt in Soil, Root Growth and Fruit Yield of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Solar-Greenhouse

Xinshu Liang; Yinan Gao; Xiaoying Zhang; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086975

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three other clusters had nonsignificant yield increases with narrower rows.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
RS narrowede1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
threee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“three had nonsignificant yield increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1087
e1

“one had a nonsignificant yield decrease as RS narrowed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1183
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–32

Title

Row Spacing in the Early Soybean Production System

Glenn R. Bowers; James L. Rabb; Lanny O. Ashlock; et al. Agronomy Journal 2000. doi:10.2134/agronj2000.923524x

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larval damage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla and O. frit was 19.3% with fertilizers versus 21.6% without, a decrease only at the tendency level.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree2
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
fertilized blocke1
Interactor
Oscinella pusilla Mg.Oscinella pusillae1pest
Second interactor
O. frit L.Oscinella frite1pest
Outcome
damage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla Mg. and O. frit L. larvaee1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
19.3%e1
Qualifier
On the average over 2011…2020 year periode1
Comparator
block without fertilizerse1

Verbatim

e1

“On the average over 2011…2020 year period, in the block without fertilizers, damage to shoots by Oscinella pusilla Mg. and O. frit L. larvae was 21.6%, in the fertilized block — 19.3% (decrease at the tendency level)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1425
e2

“in the agrocenosis of spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–101

Title

The influence of fertilizers on the damage of spring barley plants by intrastalk pests and grain yield

N. Kuzmenko Karantin i zahist roslin 2022. doi:10.36495/2312-0614.2022.4.15-20

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal interval fertigation did not statistically reduce fruit nutrition quality.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
optimal interval fertigatione0
Outcome
fruit nutrition qualitye0
Direction
did not statistically decreasee0
Comparator
conventional interval fertigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment optimal interval fertigation did not statistically decrease the economic yield and fruit nutrition quality of cucumber when compare to conventional interval fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–953
t0

“Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–136

Title

Effect of Optimal Daily Fertigation on Migration of Water and Salt in Soil, Root Growth and Fruit Yield of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Solar-Greenhouse

Xinshu Liang; Yinan Gao; Xiaoying Zhang; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086975

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)projected

Claim · model-written summary

Spring wheat yield was projected to rise 2.5% on average, without statistical significance.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“not statistically significant average yield increase of 2.5% was predicted for spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1502

Title

Both yields of maize and soybean and soil carbon sequestration in typical Mollisols cropland decrease under future climate change: SPACSYS simulation

Shuo Liang; Nan Sun; Bernard Longdoz; et al. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems 2024. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2024.1332483

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen fertilisation produced a slight nonsignificant increase in tuber yield.

Treatment
N fertilisatione0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in N fertilisation did not lead to an increase in starch yield due to a decrease in starch content and a slight insignificant increase in tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1792
t0

“potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69

Title

The effect of nitrogen use efficiency on significant traits of potato starch production

Ilze Skrabule; Lāsma Rābante-Hāne; Ilze Dimante; et al. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 2023. doi:10.13080/z-a.2023.110.037

Other claims from this paper (13)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.