Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

2 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1990 2000 ’10

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Taxon: tomatoes ✕

Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher salinity did not change the number of fruits produced.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: salinity increasese0
Outcome: number of fruits producede0
Direction: does not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“When salinity increases, the number of fruits produced does not change but their average weight and size decrease significantly.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1072

t0
“tomatoes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–101

Title

Effect of the salinity on the organoleptic quality and yield of early-grown soilless grafted tomatoes under heated glasshouses in the south of France

Robert Fabre; Muriel Duval; Benoît Jeannequin Cahiers Agricultures 2011. doi:10.1684/agr.2011.0496

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect High salinity significantly increased tomato total soluble solids across seasons and hybrids.
Intervention effect High salinity significantly increased titrable acidity except for the short shelf-life hybrid in spring.
Intervention effect Increasing salinity affected tomato firmness little.
Association Variety significantly affected tomato firmness.
Intervention effect Consumers preferred fruit grown at high salinity for both hybrids.
Intervention effect Higher salinity significantly decreased average fruit weight and size.
Intervention effect The salinity management reduced tomato yield by about 20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: deficit irrigation (DI)e0
Outcome: Fruit concentrations of Ca, Mg, and Ke2
Direction: the samee2
Qualifier: on a dry weight basise2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e2
“Fruit concentrations of Ca, Mg, and K were the same for both treatments on a dry weight basis”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–517

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics