Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate formulation did not interact with yield decrease.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
formulatione0
Outcome
formulation interaction with yield decreasee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“There was not found any formulation interaction with yield decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1313
e1

“glyphosate-tolerant soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–659

Title

Glyphosate Tolerant Soybean Response to Different Management Systems

Alfredo J. P. Albrecht; Leandro P. Albrecht; Arthur A. M. Barroso; et al. Journal of Agricultural Science 2017. doi:10.5539/jas.v10n1p204

Other claims from this paper (1)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
injure strawberry or decrease yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“provides PRE weed control in strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–150
e2

“Fomesafen did not injure strawberry or decrease yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–830

Title

Persistence and Movement of Fomesafen in Florida Strawberry Production

Thomas V. Reed; Nathan S. Boyd; P. Christopher Wilson; et al. Weed Science 2018. doi:10.1017/wsc.2018.48

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0
Qualifier
foliar damage alonee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“foliar damage alone did not decrease grain yield but decreased straw yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754

Title

Field evaluation and simulation of frost tolerance in Syrian durum wheat landraces

A. Elings; M.M. Nachit Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1993. doi:10.18174/njas.v41i1.629

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The evaluated herbicides did not decrease durum wheat yield.

Treatment
herbicides evaluatede0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There was no decrease in durum wheat yield with the herbicides evaluated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1294

Title

Sensitivity of durum wheat (Triticum turgidum) to various postemergence herbicides

Nader Soltani; Christy Shropshire; Peter H. Sikkema Agricultural Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/as.2011.24058

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When soil water potential continued to decrease, no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.

Treatment
SWP continued to be decreasede6
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
no longer obvious decreasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Yield and Quality of Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52
e2

“the yield of two cultivars was decreased significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558
e6

“but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637

Title

Effect of Soil Moisture on Yield and Quality of Rice

Zheng Gui 2006

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 4M:6S ratio did not decrease subsequent wheat yield.

Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Verbatim

e0

“but it did not decrease yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1740–1779

Title

Row Ratios of Intercropping Maize and Soybean Can Affect Agronomic Efficiency of the System and Subsequent Wheat

Yitao Zhang; Jian Liu; Jizong Zhang; et al. PLoS ONE 2015. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129245

Other claims from this paper (14)
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low combined pest densities did not decrease canola yield.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napust0
Treatment
low combined densitiese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
do not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“low combined densities do not decrease yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1122
t0

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95

Title

Effect of Insect Herbivory on the Architecture and Seed Production of Canola, Brassica napus L.

H.A. Cárcamo Journal of Entomological Science 2012. doi:10.18474/0749-8004-47.1.44

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Halving insect visits caused little decrease in sunflower yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse1
Treatment
insect visits were reduced by 50%e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
little decreasee0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“little decrease in yield when insect visits were reduced by 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–693
e1

“in sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–220

Title

Supplementary material from "Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels"

Tamburini, Giovanni; Lami, Francesco; Marini, Lorenzo Figshare 2017. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3827959.v2

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease grain yield.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
delayed autumn ploughinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
did not decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Because delayed autumn ploughing did not decrease the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–967
e1

“grain yield of spring barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–656

Title

The effect of incorporation time of different crops on the residual effect on spring cereals

H. KÄNKÄNEN; A. KANGAS; T. MELA Agricultural and Food Science 1999. doi:10.23986/afsci.5629

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster pruning did not decrease total yield across cultivars.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
no decreasee0
Comparator
unpruned controle0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no decrease in total yield, across all cultivars, between treatments and the unpruned control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2080
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31

Title

Fruit Cluster Pruning of Tomato in an Organic High-Tunnel System

Brian A. Mitchell; Mark E. Uchanski; Adriane Elliott HortScience 2019. doi:10.21273/hortsci13487-18

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.