Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

8 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W867707427 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1.59 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“decrease of yield (1.59 t/ha), TGW (5.17 g), and GI (4.59%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1402

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Rennane0
Treatment: droughte0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 6.96 to 5.15 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Rennan showed decrease of yield in drought (from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1055

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarkae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka showed decrease of yield, but increase of PC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1162

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 11.1 to 49.8%e0
Comparator: controle0

Verbatim

e0
“Genotypes showed decrease of yield from 11.1 to 49.8% compared to the yield in control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–751

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: GIe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 4.59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“decrease of yield (1.59 t/ha), TGW (5.17 g), and GI (4.59%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1402

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: TGWe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 5.17 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“decrease of yield (1.59 t/ha), TGW (5.17 g), and GI (4.59%)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1402

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: droughtt0
Outcome: PCe0
Direction: increasee0
Qualifier: Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarkae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka showed decrease of yield, but increase of PC.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1162

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rennan retained protein content at 13.0% under drought.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material: Rennane0
Treatment: droughte0
Outcome: PCe0
Direction: retainede0
Value: 13.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Rennan showed decrease of yield in drought (from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha), but retained PC (13.0%).”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1081

t0
“drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–93

Title

Influence of drought during the grain filling period to the yield and quality of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Marijana Barić; Snježana Kereša; Hrvoje Šarčević; et al. 2006

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect Drought decreased genotype yields by 11.1 to 49.8% relative to controls.
Intervention effect Protein content increased by 1.8% for some genotypes under drought.
Intervention effect Divana yield changed little under drought, from 5.31 to 5.23 t/ha, and was lowest under both conditions.
Intervention effect Divana protein content was similar under control and drought, 15.8 and 16.0%.
Intervention effect Rennan yield decreased from 6.96 to 5.15 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had decreased yields under drought.
Intervention effect Banica, Kuna, Golubica and Žitarka had increased protein content under drought.
Observation Golubica had the highest protein content in drought at 16.2%.
Observation Kuna had high protein content in drought at 15.9%.
Intervention effect Mean yield decreased by 1.59 t/ha under drought.
Intervention effect Mean thousand grain weight decreased by 5.17 g under drought.
Intervention effect Mean gluten index decreased by 4.59% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean protein content increased by 0.45% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean test weight increased by 1.02 kg/hl under drought.
Intervention effect Mean sedimentation volume increased by 1.3 ml under drought.
Intervention effect Mean wet gluten content increased by 1.35% under drought.
Intervention effect Mean falling number increased by 36.97 under drought.
Recommendation The authors consider genotypes with stable yield and high protein suitable for production under water stress.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics