Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

9 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W7161251430 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Ke2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 5.9%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: high rainfalle2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Se2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 5.2%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: high rainfalle2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Zne2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 1.6%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: high rainfalle2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Be2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 3.0%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: high rainfalle2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: all four nutrientse2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 3.3%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: high rainfalle2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Ke2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 2.0%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: medium to low rainfall contextse2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Se2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 3.6%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: medium to low rainfall contextse2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: Be2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 0.5%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: medium to low rainfall contextse2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In medium to low rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 1.7% relative to All(B).

Taxon: tefft0
Treatment: all four nutrientse2
Outcome: yield penaltiese2
Direction: decreaseinferrede2
Value: 1.7%e2
Comparator: All(B)e2
Setting: medium to low rainfall contextse2

Verbatim

t0
“enhancing teff production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54

e2
“Omitting K, S, Zn, or B, or all four nutrients resulted in the yield penalties of 5.9%, 5.2%, 1.6%, 3.0% and 3.3%, respectively, under high rainfall, and 2.0%, 3.6%, –2.3%, 0.5% and 1.7% in medium to low rainfall contexts compared to All(B)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1420

Title

Yield-limiting nutrients for enhancing teff production in contrasting landscape positions and rainfall contexts

Getachew AGEGNEHU; Gizaw DESTA; Gizachew LEGESSE; et al. ENGINEERING Agriculture 2026. doi:10.15302/j-fase-2026691

Other claims from this paper (18)

Observation In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) gave the highest teff grain yield, 1.52 t·ha–1.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 6.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 10.3% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a high rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 154% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 3.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 5.0% relative to NP.
Intervention effect In a medium to low rainfall area, 150% of All(B) increased grain yield by 84.2% relative to the control.
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 5.9% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 5.2% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting Zn reduced teff yield by 1.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 3.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In high rainfall, omitting all four nutrients reduced teff yield by 3.3% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting K reduced teff yield by 2.0% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting S reduced teff yield by 3.6% relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting Zn gave a yield penalty of –2.3%, i.e. a yield gain, relative to All(B).
Intervention effect In medium to low rainfall, omitting B reduced teff yield by 0.5% relative to All(B).
Observation N and P were the most yield-limiting nutrients for teff under all landscape positions and rainfall contexts.
Observation Teff yield response to nutrients differed significantly across landscape positions and rainfall contexts.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics