Claim · model-written summary
The W3 irrigation treatment decreased emissions per unit of water consumption by 11.0% compared with W1.
Brassica oleracea var. capitataVerbatim
e1“While the W3 treatment reduced total CO 2 emissions by 27.9% compared to W1”
e2“an 11.0% decrease in emissions per unit of water consumption”
e3“in cabbage fields treated with cattle manure”
Title
Samiratou Abdoulaye Mamane; Ustun Sahin Irrigation Science 2026. doi:10.1007/s00271-026-01100-w
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Manure application significantly increased seasonal CO2 emissions when combined with full irrigation (W1), compared with mineral fertilization.
- Intervention effect Total CO2 emissions in CM1 increased by 135.5% relative to mineral fertilization.
- Intervention effect Total CO2 emissions in CM2 increased by 158.6% relative to mineral fertilization.
- Intervention effect CO2 emissions per unit yield in CM1 increased by only 50.7% relative to mineral fertilization, owing to higher crop productivity.
- Intervention effect CO2 emissions per unit yield in CM2 increased by only 50.4% relative to mineral fertilization, owing to higher crop productivity.
- Intervention effect Emissions per unit of water consumption in CM1 rose by 140.1% relative to mineral fertilization.
- Intervention effect Emissions per unit of water consumption in CM2 rose by 164.7% relative to mineral fertilization.
- Association Emissions were positively correlated with soil moisture.
- Association Emissions were negatively correlated with soil temperature.
- Intervention effect The W3 irrigation treatment reduced total CO2 emissions by 27.9% compared with W1.
- Intervention effect The W3 irrigation treatment increased emissions per unit yield by 44.2% compared with W1.
- Recommendation Cattle manure should be applied in conjunction with the W1 and W2 irrigation treatments.
- Intervention effect The W1 and W2 treatments produced higher total yields than the W3 treatment.
- Intervention effect The W1 and W2 treatments produced lower CO2 emissions per unit yield than the W3 treatment.
- Recommendation In water-scarce regions, the W3 treatment may be a more practical strategy for minimizing emissions per unit of water consumed.