Claim · model-written summary
At the same potassium scheme, N3 grain yield was 9.0%-11.6% lower than N1.
Triticum aestivumVerbatim
e0“the grain yield of N3 treatment was significantly lower than that of N1 treatment, with a decrease of 9.0%-11.6%”
t0“winter wheat”
Title
Xiang-Yu ZHANG; Xin-Hui HU; Shu-Bo GU; et al. ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2023. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2023.21013
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect At the same potassium scheme, N2 grain yield did not differ significantly from N1.
- Intervention effect Staged potassium increased grain yield at a fixed nitrogen rate.
- Intervention effect Staged potassium increased nitrogen use efficiency at a fixed nitrogen rate.
- Intervention effect K2 inhibited leaching of nitrate nitrogen into deep soil layers versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased nitrogen accumulation in winter wheat plants versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased flag leaf photosynthetic rate versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased nitrate reductase activity versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased grain filling rate versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased number of grains per spike versus K1.
- Intervention effect K2 increased 1000-grain weight versus K1.
- Intervention effect Grain yield increased 21.7% under conventional nitrogen application rate.
- Intervention effect nitrogen use efficiency increased 20.2% under conventional nitrogen application rate.
- Intervention effect Grain yield increased 26.9% under N2 level.
- Intervention effect nitrogen use efficiency increased 26.2% under N2 level.
- Intervention effect Grain yield increased 25.2% under N3 level.
- Intervention effect nitrogen use efficiency increased 21.1% under N3 level.
- Intervention effect N3K2 had higher grain yield than N1K1.
- Intervention effect N3K2 had higher nitrogen uptake efficiency than N1K1.
- Intervention effect N3K2 had higher nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen partial productivity than N1K1.