Claim · model-written summary
Sensitive onion genotypes lost 41.6-64.8% yield.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepat0 - Material
- sensitive typese0
- Treatment
- waterloggingt0
- Outcome
- yieldt0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
- Value
- 41.6-64.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“compared to 41.6-64.8% in sensitive types.”
t0“waterlogging on microbial activity, soil nutrient availability, nutrient uptake, and yield of tolerant and sensitive onion genotypes”
Title
Amol R. Pawar; Sushant Sukumar Patil; Mayur B. Patil; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2025. doi:10.3389/fpls.2025.1692450
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Waterlogging increased soil bulk density by 5.30%.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced soil infiltration rate by 76.5%.
- Observation Microbial biomass carbon declined by 67.6% at 50 DAT.
- Observation Dehydrogenase activity declined by 55.8%.
- Observation Urease activity declined by 33.9%.
- Observation Acid phosphatase activity declined by 33.9%.
- Observation Alkaline phosphatase activity declined by 10.2%.
- Observation Available N, P and K declined significantly at 55 versus 45 DAT.
- Observation Available S, Ca and Mg declined significantly at 55 versus 45 DAT.
- Observation Available Fe, Cu and Mn declined significantly at 55 versus 45 DAT.
- Observation Available B declined significantly at 55 versus 45 DAT.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced onion nutrient uptake across genotypes.
- Intervention effect Waterlogging reduced onion yield across genotypes.
- Intervention effect Accession 1666 yield fell 21.7% under waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Bhima Dark Red Selection yield fell 18.1% under waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Raised bed planting improved tolerant genotype performance under waterlogging.
- Recommendation The authors recommend genotypic selection and raised bed cultivation for mitigating waterlogging.