Claim · model-written summary
Combined biostimulants decreased antioxidant response.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- both biostimulantse1
- Outcome
- antioxidant responsee0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“a decrease in the antioxidant response”
t0“tomato”
e1“both biostimulants promoted the accumulation of proline in roots and flavonoids in leaves”
Title
Patricia Benito; Sara Trigueros; Marina Celdrán; et al. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 2025. doi:10.1186/s40538-025-00825-8
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Combined biostimulants increased tomato yield under salt stress.
- Intervention effect Combined biostimulants promoted proline accumulation in roots.
- Intervention effect Combined biostimulants promoted flavonoid accumulation in leaves.
- Intervention effect Catalase activity in leaves remained unaltered under combined treatment.
- Intervention effect Root ascorbate peroxidase activity increased slightly under combined treatment.
- Intervention effect Joint treatment increased cytokinin isopentenyladenine riboside content in roots and leaves.
- Intervention effect Joint treatment significantly accumulated Krebs cycle intermediates under salt stress.
- Mechanism Authors propose cytokinins protect chloroplasts and photosynthetic function, increasing available sugar.
- Mechanism Authors propose increased available energy lets plants produce more fruit under salt stress.
- Mechanism Authors propose increased available energy improves salt-stress response.
- Mechanism Authors suggest IPR may protect the photosynthetic system and reduce reactive oxygen species.