Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4399331287 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: root yield, aboveground biomass yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter squaree0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: NTSe0
Outcome: emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gasese0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 23.44e0
Comparator: CTe1

Verbatim

e0
“NTS, NT, and CTS significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) by 23.44, 19.57, and 16.54%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2343

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“conventional tillage (CT) control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: NTe0
Outcome: emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gasese0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 19.57e0
Comparator: CTe1

Verbatim

e0
“NTS, NT, and CTS significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) by 23.44, 19.57, and 16.54%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2343

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“conventional tillage (CT) control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTSe0
Outcome: emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gasese0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 16.54%e0
Comparator: CTe1

Verbatim

e0
“NTS, NT, and CTS significantly ( p < 0.05) reduced the emission and net global warming potential of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) by 23.44, 19.57, and 16.54%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2343

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“conventional tillage (CT) control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics