Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

15 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4399331287 ✕

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: NTS is the best approach to increasing yield, soil and water conservation, resilience, and mitigation of agroecosystem capacitye0

Verbatim

e0
“We conclude that NTS is the best approach to increasing yield, soil and water conservation, resilience, and mitigation of agroecosystem capacity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2440–2584

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: root yield, aboveground biomass yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: conservation tillage systemse1
Outcome: soil temperature and bulk densitye0
Direction: decreasinge0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“decreasing the soil temperature and bulk density over CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1898–1954

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“conservation tillage systems”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1400

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter squaree0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“different conservative tillage systems (CTS, NTS, and NT) significantly ( p < 0.05) increased the plant height, number of spikes per plant, seed number per meter square, root yield, aboveground biomass yield, thousand-grain weight, grain yield, and dry matter yield compared with CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1354

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: NTSe1
Outcome: greenhouse gas intensitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 23.20e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“decreased the greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20, 29.96, and 18.72%, respectively, over CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2349–2438

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“regimes NTS, NT, and CTS significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2170

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: NTe1
Outcome: greenhouse gas intensitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 29.96e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“decreased the greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20, 29.96, and 18.72%, respectively, over CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2349–2438

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“regimes NTS, NT, and CTS significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2170

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTSe1
Outcome: greenhouse gas intensitye0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 18.72%e0
Comparator: CTe0

Verbatim

e0
“decreased the greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20, 29.96, and 18.72%, respectively, over CT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2349–2438

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“regimes NTS, NT, and CTS significantly”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2132–2170

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: conservation tillage systemse1
Outcome: total potassium, available potassium, microbial countse0
Direction: improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“total potassium, available potassium, microbial counts, urease, alkaline phosphatase, invertase, cellulase, and catalase”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1890

e1
“these conservation tillage systems notably improved the soil properties”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1437

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation tillage showed non-significant effects on soil electrical conductivity, pH and stoichiometric ratios.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: CTS, NTS, and NTe0
Outcome: ECe, pH, and stoichiometric propertiese0
Comparator: CTe1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“CTS, NTS, and NT had non-significant effects on ECe, pH, and stoichiometric properties (C:N ratio, C:P ratio, and N:P ratio)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1965–2089

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–118

e1
“conventional tillage (CT) control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–757

Title

Conservation tillage: a way to improve yield and soil properties and decrease global warming potential in spring wheat agroecosystems

Mahran Sadiq; Nasir Rahim; Majid Mahmood Tahir; et al. Frontiers in Microbiology 2024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356426

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat plant height, spikes per plant and seeds per square meter relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat root, aboveground biomass and dry matter yields relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage significantly increased wheat thousand-grain weight and grain yield relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil water content, pore space and water storage over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil organic carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus properties over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage improved soil potassium, microbial counts and measured soil enzyme activities over conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Conservation tillage lowered soil temperature and bulk density relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 23.44% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 19.57% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas emissions and net global warming potential by 16.54% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 23.20% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect NT reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 29.96% relative to conventional tillage.
Intervention effect CTS reduced greenhouse gas intensity by 18.72% relative to conventional tillage.
Recommendation The authors recommend NTS to increase yield and improve soil and water conservation and climate resilience.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics