Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4395033336 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin-M seed dressing reduced seedling mortality to 0.70% versus the control plots.

Treatment
Topsin-Me1
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
seedling mortalitye1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
0.70%e1
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e1

“Fungicide Topsin-M ranked first and sowing of barley with Topsin inoculated seed resulted in 198.67 seed germination m-2, 0.70% seedling mortality, 1.34 grains infected by covered smut, 2.08 percent infected grain, 413.33 spikes m-2, 38.16 grains spike-1, 10.75cm spike length and 3220.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–924
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topsin-M seed dressing reduced covered-smut infected grain to 2.08 percent versus the control plots.

Treatment
Topsin-Me1
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
infected graine1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1
Value
2.08 percente1
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e1

“Fungicide Topsin-M ranked first and sowing of barley with Topsin inoculated seed resulted in 198.67 seed germination m-2, 0.70% seedling mortality, 1.34 grains infected by covered smut, 2.08 percent infected grain, 413.33 spikes m-2, 38.16 grains spike-1, 10.75cm spike length and 3220.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–924
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bayton 10 DS seed dressing reduced seedling mortality to 1.11% versus the control plots.

Treatment
Bayton 10 DSe4
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
seedling mortalitye4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
1.11%e4
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e4

“The fungicide Bayton 10 DS ranked second and sowing of barley with Bayton inoculated seed resulted in 182.67 seed germination m-2, 1.11% seedling mortality, 2.14 grains infected by covered smut, 3.05 percent infected grain, 395.67 spikes m-2, 36.50 grains spike-1, 10.43cm spike length and 3037.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1242
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bayton 10 DS seed dressing reduced covered-smut infected grain to 3.05 percent versus the control plots.

Treatment
Bayton 10 DSe4
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
infected graine4
Direction
decreaseinferrede4
Value
3.05 percente4
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e4

“The fungicide Bayton 10 DS ranked second and sowing of barley with Bayton inoculated seed resulted in 182.67 seed germination m-2, 1.11% seedling mortality, 2.14 grains infected by covered smut, 3.05 percent infected grain, 395.67 spikes m-2, 36.50 grains spike-1, 10.43cm spike length and 3037.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1242
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dividend-Star 36 FS seed dressing reduced seedling mortality to 1.69% versus the control plots.

Treatment
Dividend-Star 36 FSe5
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
seedling mortalitye5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
1.69%e5
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e5

“The seed dressing fungicide Dividend-Star 36 FS ranked third and sowing of barley with Dividend inoculated seed resulted in 171.67 seed germination m-2, 1.69% seedling mortality, 2.51 grains infected by covered smut, 4.85 percent infected grain, 380.67 spikes m-2, 34.61 grains spike-1, 10.30cm spike length and 2980.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1582
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dividend-Star 36 FS seed dressing reduced covered-smut infected grain to 4.85 percent versus the control plots.

Treatment
Dividend-Star 36 FSe5
Interactor
Ustilago hordeiUstilago hordeie2pathogen
Outcome
infected graine5
Direction
decreaseinferrede5
Value
4.85 percente5
Comparator
control plotse3

Verbatim

e0

“Barley is an important field crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–33
e2

“identify the efficient seed dressing synthetic fungicide against Ustilago hordei causing covered smut of barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–180
e5

“The seed dressing fungicide Dividend-Star 36 FS ranked third and sowing of barley with Dividend inoculated seed resulted in 171.67 seed germination m-2, 1.69% seedling mortality, 2.51 grains infected by covered smut, 4.85 percent infected grain, 380.67 spikes m-2, 34.61 grains spike-1, 10.30cm spike length and 2980.70kg ha-1 grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1582
e3

“The control plots, where the barley was sown without seed inoculation ranked least (4th) and resulted in 159 seed germination m-2, 3.68% seedling mortality, 3.81 grains infected by covered smut, 10.63 percent infected grain, 333.33 spikes m-2, 34.67 grains spike-1, 10.03cm spike length and 2591kg ha-1 yield of the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1905

Title

Identification of Effective Seed Dressing Synthetic Fungicide against Covered Smut of Barley

Nawab Ali Ghouri; Muhammad Waris Phytopathogenomics and Disease Control 2024. doi:10.22194/pdc/3.1034

Other claims from this paper (10)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.