Claim · model-written summary
Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
- Taxon
- pigeonpea
Cajanus cajane2 - Treatment
- Hand-weedinge2
- Outcome
- weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletione2
- Direction
- decreasee2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e2“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
Title
Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes
B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
- Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
- Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.
- Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.