Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4390289810 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: Hand-weedinge2
Outcome: weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletione2
Direction: decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethaline2
Outcome: weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletione2
Direction: decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: Hand-weedinge2
Outcome: yield attributes and yielde2
Direction: increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethaline2
Outcome: yield attributes and yielde2
Direction: increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: Hand-weedinge2
Outcome: net return, net returnlmpees and benefit : cost ratioe3
Direction: highere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

e3
“Their application resulted in higher net return, net returnlmpees and benefit : cost ratio”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–850

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Taxon: pigeonpeaCajanus cajane2
Treatment: tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethaline2
Outcome: net return, net returnlmpees and benefit : cost ratioe3
Direction: highere3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“Hand-weeding and tank mix of imazethapyr + pendimethalin effected significant decrease in weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion and conspicuous increase in yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea in both years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–758

e3
“Their application resulted in higher net return, net returnlmpees and benefit : cost ratio”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–850

Title

Chemical weed control in pigeonpea (Cajunus cajan) intercropped with short-duration grain legumes

B. M. PATIL; JITENDRA PANDEY Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v41i4.3703

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea suppressed weed growth in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea arrested nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping with cowpea significantly increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Greengram had a slightly lower effect than cowpea in the wet year and a minor effect in the drought year.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin significantly decreased weed population, weed dry weight and nutrient depletion in pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect The tank mix of imazethapyr and pendimethalin conspicuously increased yield attributes and yield of pigeonpea.
Intervention effect Intercropping systems gave higher return than sole cropping in both years.
Intervention effect Hand-weeding resulted in higher net return, net return and benefit:cost ratio in pigeonpea.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics