Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4386377846 ✕

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis per leaf area remained constant.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
constante0
Qualifier
on a leaf area basise0

Verbatim

e0

“keeping photosynthesis constant on a leaf area basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1493
t0

“switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Switchgrass readjusted the timing and activity of sink organs.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
timing and activity of sink organse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“readjusted the timing and activity of sink organs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1498–1547
t0

“switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Switchgrass increased plant photosynthesis by increasing photosynthetic leaf area.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Outcome
plant photosynthesise0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
increasing the photosynthetic leaf areae0

Verbatim

e0

“It increased plant photosynthesis by increasing the photosynthetic leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1434
t0

“switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reserve depleted switchgrass restored rhizome starch to pre storage levels.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Outcome
rhizome starch reservese0
Direction
restorede0
Comparator
pre‐storage levelse0

Verbatim

e0

“reserve‐depleted switchgrass restored its rhizome starch reserves to pre‐storage levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1244

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest breeding to extend the aboveground growing season should not compromise perennial grass persistence.

Taxon
perennial grassese0
Outcome
extend the aboveground growing seasone0

Verbatim

e0

“current breeding strategies in perennial grasses aimed to extend the aboveground growing season should not compromise crop persistence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1816

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reserve depleted switchgrass had 60% larger leaf area than controls.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatume0
Treatment
reserve‐depletede0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
largere0
Value
60%e0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“reserve‐depleted switchgrass had 60% larger leaf area (LA; LA control = 149 cm 2 pot −1 vs. LA depleted = 239 cm 2 pot −1 ; p = 0.013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1033

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizome respiration at 25°C was 5.3 times that at 5°C.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Organ / stage
rhizomee0
Treatment
25°Ce0
Outcome
rhizome respiratione0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.3×e0
Comparator
5°Ce0

Verbatim

e0

“During the storage period rhizome respiration was 5.3× higher at 25°C (0.010 μmol CO 2 g −1 min −1 at 5°C vs. 0.054 μmol CO 2 g −1 min −1 at 25°C; p < 0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–818
t0

“switchgrass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–30

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reserve depleted switchgrass produced about 40% more aboveground biomass than controls.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Treatment
reserve‐depletede1
Outcome
aboveground biomasse0
Direction
moree0
Value
~40%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“produced ~40% more aboveground biomass than control plants (9.46 g pot −1 vs. 6.63 g pot −1 ; p = 0.112)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1142
t0

“switchgrass rhizome reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–47
e1

“reserve‐depleted switchgrass had 60% larger leaf area (LA; LA control = 149 cm 2 pot −1 vs. LA depleted = 239 cm 2 pot −1 ; p = 0.013)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1033

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at 25°C depleted rhizome starch by 30%.

Taxon
switchgrassPanicum virgatumt0
Organ / stage
rhizomet0
Treatment
25°Ce1
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
depletede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the starch content was depleted by 30% by the end of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–883
t0

“switchgrass rhizome reserves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–47
e1

“During the storage period rhizome respiration was 5.3× higher at 25°C (0.010 μmol CO 2 g −1 min −1 at 5°C vs. 0.054 μmol CO 2 g −1 min −1 at 25°C; p < 0.0001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 660–818

Title

A 30% reduction in switchgrass rhizome reserves did not decrease biomass yield

Mauricio Tejera‐Nieves; Berkley J. Walker GCB Bioenergy 2023. doi:10.1111/gcbb.13094

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.