Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Treatment: planting cover cropse2
Outcome: yield and N uptakee2
Direction: increasede2
Comparator: the control (no cover crops)e2

Verbatim

e2
“Compared with the control (no cover crops), planting cover crops increased yield and N uptake of the maize while reducing the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1361

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.

Taxon: watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment: semi-covere0
Outcome: fruit yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 10.84 Mg·ha−1e0
Comparator: full cover treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the full cover treatment, semi-cover and no cover treatments increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% and 73.85%, and fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 and 11.48 Mg·ha−1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1123

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.

Taxon: watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment: no covere0
Outcome: fruit yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 11.48 Mg·ha−1e0
Comparator: full cover treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the full cover treatment, semi-cover and no cover treatments increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% and 73.85%, and fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 and 11.48 Mg·ha−1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1123

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.

Taxon: watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment: semi-covere0
Outcome: fruit set ratee0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 42.95%e0
Comparator: full cover treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the full cover treatment, semi-cover and no cover treatments increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% and 73.85%, and fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 and 11.48 Mg·ha−1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1123

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.

Taxon: watermelonCitrullus lanatuse0
Treatment: no covere0
Outcome: fruit set ratee0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 73.85%e0
Comparator: full cover treatmente0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with the full cover treatment, semi-cover and no cover treatments increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% and 73.85%, and fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 and 11.48 Mg·ha−1, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1123

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting cover crops reduced the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1 compared with the control without cover crops.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse2
Treatment: planting cover cropse2
Outcome: apparent N surpluse2
Direction: reducinge2
Value: 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1e2
Comparator: the control (no cover crops)e2

Verbatim

e2
“Compared with the control (no cover crops), planting cover crops increased yield and N uptake of the maize while reducing the apparent N surplus by 25.9–26.0 kg·ha−1”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1361

Title

Ecological intensification measures to improve productivity and decrease nitrogen surplus in wheat-maize/watermelon intercropping system

Chen Yanjie; Yang Xiaotong; Zhang Yi; et al. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022. doi:10.1080/13504509.2022.2124552

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Semi-cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 42.95% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased the fruit set rate of watermelon by 73.85% compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect Semi-cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 10.84 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Intervention effect No cover increased watermelon fruit yield by 11.48 Mg·ha−1 compared with the full cover treatment.
Observation Pollination services accounted for 57.5% of relative watermelon yield.
Intervention effect Planting cover crops increased maize yield and N uptake compared with the control without cover crops.
Observation After maize harvest, inorganic N was largely distributed below the 60 cm soil depth.
Recommendation Providing pollination services and planting cover crops are promising ecological intensification measures for watermelon intercropping.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics