Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

10 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W4253908256 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 41.96%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: seed weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 74.7%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: harvest indexe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 73.3%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: pod numbere0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 65.2%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: seed numbere0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 64.9%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“several traits showed a significant mean decrease in CSPS compared to ESPS as plant height by 41.96%, seed weight by 74.7%, harvest index by 73.3%, pod number by 65.2%, and seed number by 64.9%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1313

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: root fresh weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 40.4%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1718

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: root dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 70.2%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1718

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: shoot fresh weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 68.1%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1718

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: shoot dry weighte0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 80.1%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1718

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CSPS decreased maximum root length by 83.3% relative to ESPS.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: CSPSe0
Outcome: maximum root lengthe0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 83.3%e0
Comparator: ESPSe0

Verbatim

e0
“The results indicated an average decrease of 40.4% in root fresh weight, of 70.2% in root dry weight, of 68.1% in shoot fresh weight, of 80.1% in shoot dry weight, and of 83.3% in maximum root length in CSPS compared to ESPS.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1718

t0
“Soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–44

Title

Comparison of Early and Conventional Soybean Production Systems for Yield and other Agronomic Traits

Khaled Ouertani; Evandrew Washington; Patricia Lage; et al. Atlas Journal of Plant Biology 2011. doi:10.5147/ajpb.2011.0008

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Survival was 83.7 to 90.22% under ESPS versus 21.74% under CSPS.
Intervention effect Almost all measured traits differed significantly between planting systems.
Intervention effect CSPS increased flowering time by 9 days compared with ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased plant height by 41.96% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed weight by 74.7% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased harvest index by 73.3% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased pod number by 65.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased seed number by 64.9% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root fresh weight by 40.4% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased root dry weight by 70.2% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot fresh weight by 68.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS decreased shoot dry weight by 80.1% relative to ESPS.
Intervention effect CSPS increased lateral root numbers by 12.7% relative to ESPS.
Recommendation Authors advise that CSPS may be inappropriate for soybean in NC Sandhills.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics