Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 6 non-evaluative

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W3210269524 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3.18-26.76 %e0
Comparator: normale1

Verbatim

e0
“during the reproductive phase the grain yield may decrease by 0.67–8.64 % and 3.18-26.76 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–939

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

e1
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.
Intervention effect At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.67–8.64 %e0
Comparator: normale1

Verbatim

e0
“during the reproductive phase the grain yield may decrease by 0.67–8.64 % and 3.18-26.76 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–939

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

e1
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.
Intervention effect At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1.91-24.10 %e0
Comparator: normale1

Verbatim

e0
“during the whole season the grain yield may decrease by 1.52-27.10 % and 1.91-24.10 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1042

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

e1
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.
Intervention effect At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe1
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 1.52-27.10 %e0
Comparator: normale1

Verbatim

e0
“during the whole season the grain yield may decrease by 1.52-27.10 % and 1.91-24.10 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1042

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

e1
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.
Intervention effect At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 3.61-19.54 %e0
Comparator: normale0
Setting: Amritsare0

Verbatim

e0
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

At Amritsar, CERES-Wheat predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 0.36-15.23 %.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oCe0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 0.36-15.23 %e0
Comparator: normale0
Setting: Amritsare0

Verbatim

e0
“In Amritsar the CERES-Wheat and INFOCROP model predicted that with the increase in temperature by 1.0 to 2.0oC from normal during the vegetative phase, the grain yield may decrease by 0.36-15.23 % and 3.61-19.54 % respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–834

t0
“WHEAT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–89

Title

SIMULATING THE IMPACT OF WITHIN SEASON VARIABILITY IN TEMPERATURE ON GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT

Amarinder Singh Riar; Sarabjit Singh; Prabhjyot Kaur; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2021. doi:10.18006/2021.9(spl-3-nrmcssa_2021).s297.s305

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect At Amritsar, INFOCROP predicted vegetative warming would reduce grain yield 3.61-19.54 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 0.67–8.64 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted reproductive warming would reduce yield 3.18-26.76 %.
Intervention effect CERES-Wheat predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.52-27.10 %.
Intervention effect INFOCROP predicted whole-season warming would reduce yield 1.91-24.10 %.
Association HD 3086 performed better than PBW 621 under thermal stress at both sites.
Association INFOCROP predicted PBW 621 performed better than HD 3086 at Ludhiana with warming up to 3°C.
Intervention effect Mid-November sowing better counteracted warming effects than October or December sowing.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics