Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 6 non-evaluative

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W3200166708 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Favorytkae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Holikovskae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN)e0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Favorytkae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII)e0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Holikovskae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII)e0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Favorytkae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP)e0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Holikovska showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.

Taxon: TriticumTriticumt0
Material: Holikovskae0
Treatment: combined action of water stress and NPs treatmente0
Outcome: chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP)e0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) and actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) levels, the decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) were observed in Favorytka and Holikovska cultivars under the combined action of water stress and NPs treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–1084

t0
“Triticum cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–50

Title

Photosynthetic response of some Triticum cultivars to the combined influence of nanofertilizers and water deficit

Oleksandr Smirnov; Nataliia SVIETLOVA; Nataliia TOPCHIY; et al. Journal of Central European Agriculture 2021. doi:10.5513/jcea01/22.3.3174

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Water deficit, induced by PEG did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect treatment with metal NPs (Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn) did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect their combined action did not affect Fv/Fm in the studied wheat leaves.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced Fv′/Fm′ in Favorytka leaves.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in chlorophyll fluorescence photochemical quenching (qP) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed increase in actual quantum yield of PSII electron transport (φPSII) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Favorytka showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect Holikovska showed decrease in non-photochemical quenching coefficient (qN) under combined water stress and nanoparticle treatment.
Intervention effect NP treatment with PEG did not add pigment-related stress to wheat seedlings.
Intervention effect NP treatment did not reduce the negative effect of simulated water deficit on Favorytka seedlings.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics