View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W3178295478 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decrease d by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.43 t/ha or 16.3 % e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decreased by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decreased by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decreased by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decreased by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decreased by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decrease d by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.35 t/ha or 24.6 % e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decreased by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decreased by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decreased by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decreased by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decreased by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decrease d by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.40 t/ha or 29.6 % e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decreased by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decreased by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decreased by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decreased by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decreased by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decrease d by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.72 t/ha or 22.4% e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decreased by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decreased by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decreased by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decreased by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decreased by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decrease d by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.70 t/ha or 21.8 % e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decreased by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decreased by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decreased by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decreased by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decreased by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 3-field rotation decrease d by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %.
Treatmenttransition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth e3 Outcomeyield of field crops e3 Value0.87 t/ha or 26.6 % e3 Comparatorfirst-fourth rotation e3 Setting3-field crop rotation e3 Verbatim
e3 “During the transition from the first-fourth rotation to the fifth-eighth, a significant decrease in the yield of field crops was established: winter wheat in the 3-field crop rotation by 0.87 t/ha or 26.6 %, 2-field by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4% and 4-field by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %; millet by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %, spring hard by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %, soft by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1485 Other claims from this paper (16) Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest mean grain yield, 1.63 t/ha over 1989-2020. Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.82 t/ha, in the first-fourth rotations (1989-2004). Association The 4-field grain – fallow crop rotation gave the highest grain yield, 1.44 t/ha, in the fifth-eighth rotations (2005-2020). Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 2-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.11 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) in the 3-field rotation reduced grain yield by 0.30 t/ha compared with the 4-field rotation, on average over all years. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.22 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.28 t/ha in the first-fourth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.20 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect Absence of spring late crop (millet) reduced grain yield by 0.32 t/ha in the fifth-eighth rotations compared with the 4-field rotation. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 2-field rotation decreased by 0.72 t/ha or 22.4%. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, winter wheat yield in the 4-field rotation decreased by 0.70 t/ha or 21.8 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, millet yield decreased by 0.43 t/ha or 16.3 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring hard wheat yield decreased by 0.40 t/ha or 29.6 %. Intervention effect During the transition from the first-fourth to the fifth-eighth rotations, spring soft wheat yield decreased by 0.35 t/ha or 24.6 %. Association In all three spring crops the yield reduction is 2.0 times lower than that of winter wheat. Observation Winter wheat yield fluctuated within the limits of the experimental error across crop rotations. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.