View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W3176326228 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change.
grain filling stage e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-11.8, -35.7 and -28.4 percent (grain filling stage) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1665 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change.
grain filling stage e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-11.8, -35.7 and -28.4 percent (grain filling stage) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1665 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change.
pre-flowering e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater resulted in the forage yield of 37.5, -29.3, and 12.9 percent (pre-flowering) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1531 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change.
grain filling stage e0 100 percent mixture of wastewater e1 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-11.8, -35.7 and -28.4 percent (grain filling stage) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1613–1665 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change.
after 50 percent of the plant to flowering e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-31, -15.3, and -47.4 percent (after 50 percent of the plant to flowering) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1607 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change.
after 50 percent of the plant to flowering e0 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-31, -15.3, and -47.4 percent (after 50 percent of the plant to flowering) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1607 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At 50% flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a -47.4% forage yield change.
after 50 percent of the plant to flowering e0 100 percent mixture of wastewater e1 decrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “-31, -15.3, and -47.4 percent (after 50 percent of the plant to flowering) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1607 e1 “25, 75, and 100 percent mixture of wastewater ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1408–1453 t0 “(Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–148 e2 “forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1482 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Irrigation regimes significantly affected measured yield and component parameters other than plant height. Intervention effect Irrigation regimes did not significantly affect plant height. Intervention effect Harvest time significantly affected measured parameters other than leaf width. Intervention effect Harvest time did not significantly affect leaf width. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for leaf number, panicle length and width, and leaf, panicle and stem traits. Association Irrigation and harvest time interacted significantly for plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and leaf length and width. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a 37.5% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -29.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At pre-flowering, 100% wastewater was associated with a 12.9% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 25% wastewater was associated with a -31% forage yield change. Intervention effect At 50% flowering, 75% wastewater was associated with a -15.3% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 25% wastewater was associated with a -11.8% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 75% wastewater was associated with a -35.7% forage yield change. Intervention effect At grain filling, 100% wastewater was associated with a -28.4% forage yield change. Intervention effect The greatest forage weight was 46.2 g per plant with 75 parts treated wastewater and 25 parts freshwater, harvested at 50% flowering. Recommendation The authors considered the 75:25 wastewater–freshwater treatment at 50% flowering best, pending field research. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Sorghum