View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W3169406248 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G:2S complex decrease d root rot damage by 8.1% against control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 polyfunctional complex 1G:2S e1 plant damage by root rot e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “a decrease in plant damage by root rot (by 8.1%) compared with the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1451 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hydrogel at 60 kg/ha produced the maximum yield of an individual plant.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 yield of a single plant e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “In the 1G option of the experiment, the maximum yield of a single plant in the experiment was recorded. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1555 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G:2S complex accelerated plant maturation by 9.1%.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 polyfunctional complex 1G:2S e1 plant maturation e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “an acceleration of plant maturation (by 9.1%) as well as a decrease in plant damage by root rot (by 8.1%) compared with the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1319–1451 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G:2S complex maximized average potential yield of soft wheat and triticale.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 polyfunctional complex 1G:2S e0 average potential yield e0 maximum increase e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “The combined application of the preparations in the polyfunctional complex 1G:2S contributed to the maximum increase in the average potential yield of soft wheat and triticale. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1235 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G:2S complex increased field seed germination by 32.1% relative to control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 polyfunctional complex 1G:2S e1 field germination of seeds e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “This effect was caused by an increase in field germination of seeds (by 32.1%) and an acceleration of plant maturation (by 9.1%) as well as a decrease in plant damage by root rot (by 8.1%) compared with the control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1451 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G option had the least yellow rust damage.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 plant damage by yellow rust e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “minimum plant damage by yellow rust in the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1849 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G option increased productive bushiness by 26.5% relative to control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 productive bushiness e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “This can be explained by the maximal increase in the productive bushiness (by 26.5%), the root weight (by 68.9%), the number of nodal roots (by 52.2%), and the number of spikelets per spike (by 7.7%) compared to the control as well as the minimum plant damage by yellow rust in the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1849 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G option increased root weight by 68.9% relative to control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “This can be explained by the maximal increase in the productive bushiness (by 26.5%), the root weight (by 68.9%), the number of nodal roots (by 52.2%), and the number of spikelets per spike (by 7.7%) compared to the control as well as the minimum plant damage by yellow rust in the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1849 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G option increased number of nodal roots by 52.2% relative to control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 number of nodal roots e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “This can be explained by the maximal increase in the productive bushiness (by 26.5%), the root weight (by 68.9%), the number of nodal roots (by 52.2%), and the number of spikelets per spike (by 7.7%) compared to the control as well as the minimum plant damage by yellow rust in the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1849 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The 1G option increased number of spikelets per spike by 7.7% relative to control.
soft wheat and triticale cultivars t0 number of spikelets per spike e0 Verbatim
t0 “soft wheat and triticale cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–257 e0 “This can be explained by the maximal increase in the productive bushiness (by 26.5%), the root weight (by 68.9%), the number of nodal roots (by 52.2%), and the number of spikelets per spike (by 7.7%) compared to the control as well as the minimum plant damage by yellow rust in the experiment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1849 e1 “polyfunctional complex 1G:2S ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1139 e2 “In the 1G option of the experiment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1486 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.