Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2020

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W3164136025 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: vegetative growthe0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: total yielde0
Direction: without compromisinge0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatmente1
Outcome: crop water use efficiencye0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2083

e1
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: watere0
Direction: lesse0
Value: 43%e0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: total soluble solid contente0
Direction: increasee0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: plant and soil water deficitse0
Direction: promotede0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising nectarine fruit quality parameters.

Taxon: nectarinePrunus persica var. nucipersicat0
Treatment: T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest)e0
Outcome: nectarine fruit quality parameterse0
Direction: without compromisinge0
Qualifier: low water availability scenarioe0
Comparator: the controle0

Verbatim

e0
“In the low water availability scenario, the T-A treatment (subjected to MAD = 10% during pre-harvest and 30% during post-harvest) received 43% less water than the control, which promoted moderate plant and soil water deficits, leading to a decrease in vegetative growth (winter pruning weight and tree canopy cover), without compromising the total yield and nectarine fruit quality parameters (including an increase in t…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–2021

t0
“nectarine orchard”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–117

Title

Automated soil water content-based irrigation under high and low water availability scenarios for a nectarine orchard

María R. Conesa; Wenceslao Conejero; Juan Vera; et al. 2021. doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-11033

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in plant-soil water status.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in yield.
Intervention effect Under high water availability, automated and conventional irrigation showed no significant difference in nectarine fruit quality parameters.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation less water by 43%.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation promoted plant and soil water deficits.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation decrease vegetative growth.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation without compromising total yield.
Intervention effect Under low water availability, automated irrigation increase total soluble solid content.
Intervention effect Crop water use efficiency increased by an average of 34%.
Recommendation The authors considered automated MAD-threshold irrigation promising for water-scarce stone fruit orchards.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics