View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W3126382331 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm decrease d peel proportion to 14.94%.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1281 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm decrease d stone proportion to 10.51%.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1281 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 25 ppm significantly decrease d fruit drop to 85.77%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm significantly increased fruit yield to 50.67 kg/tree.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Plants sprayed with the GA3 at 50 ppm results significantly more fruit yield (50.67 kg/tree) of fruits having more polar (9.11 cm) and equatorial diameter (7.39 cm), more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1281 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp proportion to 74.56%.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1281 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 50 ppm increased pulp to stone ratio to 7.12.
Outcomepulp: stone ratio e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “more pulp (74.56%), pulp: stone ratio (7.12) with decrease in peel (14.94%) and stone per cent (10.51%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1281 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruit retention to 14.23%.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
GA3 at 25 ppm increased fruits per panicle to 6.43.
Outcomenumber of fruits per panicle e0 Directionincrease inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “pre-harvest spraying of GA3 at 25 ppm results significant decrease in fruit drop (85.77%) with increase in fruit retention (14.23 %) and number of fruits per panicle (6.43). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1010 t0 “Mango cv. Amrapali ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–130 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.