Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2955998398 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Cococdriee1
Treatment: R. solani alonee1
Interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: Percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 23.9e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Percent yield losses in Cococdrie in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 5.6, 23.9, and 20.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–882

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Jeffersone1
Treatment: R. solani alonee1
Interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 10.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Similarly, percent yield losses in Jefferson in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 7.3, 10.6, and 5.4%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1048

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Cococdriee1
Treatment: exposure to L. oryzophiluse1
Interactor: L. oryzophilusLissorhoptrus oryzophiluse1pest
Outcome: Percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 5.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Percent yield losses in Cococdrie in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 5.6, 23.9, and 20.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–882

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Jeffersone1
Treatment: exposure to L. oryzophiluse1
Interactor: L. oryzophilusLissorhoptrus oryzophiluse1pest
Outcome: percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 7.3e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Similarly, percent yield losses in Jefferson in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 7.3, 10.6, and 5.4%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1048

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Cococdriee1
Treatment: exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solanie1
Interactor: L. oryzophilusLissorhoptrus oryzophiluse1pest
Second interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: Percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 20.0e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Percent yield losses in Cococdrie in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 5.6, 23.9, and 20.0%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–882

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 5.4 in Jefferson.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Material: Jeffersone1
Treatment: exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solanie1
Interactor: L. oryzophilusLissorhoptrus oryzophiluse1pest
Second interactor: R. solaniRhizoctonia solanie1pathogen
Outcome: percent yield lossese1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Value: 5.4e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“rice, Oryza sativa L.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–41

e1
“Similarly, percent yield losses in Jefferson in response to exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani alone and in combination were 7.3, 10.6, and 5.4%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1048

Title

Interactive Impacts of Rice Water Weevil1 and Sheath Blight Pathogen on Rice Yield

Suhas S. Vyavhare; Michael O. Way; Rebecca A. Pearson; et al. Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0201

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus infestation had no influence on sheath blight severity in Jefferson.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Cocodrie was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect Grain yield of Jefferson was significantly less in response to L. oryzophilus infestation.
Intervention effect R. solani infection alone significantly reduced yield in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Exposure to L. oryzophilus alone gave a percent yield loss of 5.6 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 23.9 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect Combined exposure to L. oryzophilus and R. solani gave a percent yield loss of 20.0 in Cocodrie.
Intervention effect L. oryzophilus exposure alone gave a percent yield loss of 7.3 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect R. solani alone gave a percent yield loss of 10.6 in Jefferson.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on yield in Cocodrie did not differ significantly from R. solani alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of R. solani and L. oryzophilus on yield in Jefferson did not vary significantly from either alone.
Intervention effect The combined impact of L. oryzophilus and R. solani on rice yield was less than additive.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics