View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W2514717362 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%.
1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%.
1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–774 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 decrease d wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%.
Grain-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Grain-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 decrease d wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%.
Grain-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Grain-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P45 decrease d wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%.
Grain-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Grain-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (34%) and P45 (17%), and at P45 over P0 (21%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–966 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 decrease d wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%.
Straw-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Straw-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (25%) and P45 (18%), and over P0 at P45 (8%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1141 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P90 decrease d wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%.
Straw-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Straw-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (25%) and P45 (18%), and over P0 at P45 (8%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1141 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
P45 decrease d wheat straw Cd over P0 by 8%.
Straw-Cd concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Straw-Cd concentration decrease d at P90 over P0 (25%) and P45 (18%), and over P0 at P45 (8%). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1141 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P0, with a reported range of 24-132%. Intervention effect P90 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over P45, with a reported range of 3.7-37%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%. Intervention effect SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM1, with a reported range of 1.4 to 2.4-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 34%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat grain Cd over P45 by 17%. Intervention effect P45 decreased wheat grain Cd over P0 by 21%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 22%. Intervention effect SM1 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM0 by 8%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat grain Cd over SM1 by 2.7-fold. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P0 by 25%. Intervention effect P90 decreased wheat straw Cd over P45 by 18%. Intervention effect SM2 decreased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 18%. Intervention effect SM1 increased wheat straw Cd over SM0 by 9%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat TGW over SM0 by 8.6. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 increased wheat straw-P over SM0 by 29%. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat Grain-Cd over SM0 by 30. Intervention effect P90 with SM2 decreased wheat straw-Cd over SM0 by 23%. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SM2 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 13-57%.
phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens e1 symbiont 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%), and in case of SM2 (13-57%) and SM1 (5.4-34%) over SM0, and for SM2 over SM1 (1.4 to 2.4-fold) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–870 e1 “seed inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, i.e. no Pseudomonas fluorescens (SM0), with ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM1) and with phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–464 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
SM1 increased wheat TGW, yield and P concentration over SM0, with a reported range of 5.4-34%.
ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens e1 symbiont 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration e0 Verbatim
t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–133 e0 “Increased 1000-grain weight (TGW), yield and P concentration of wheat was noted at P90 over P0 (24-132%) and P45 (3.7-37%), and in case of SM2 (13-57%) and SM1 (5.4-34%) over SM0, and for SM2 over SM1 (1.4 to 2.4-fold) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–870 e1 “seed inoculation with rhizobacterial strains, i.e. no Pseudomonas fluorescens (SM0), with ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM1) and with phosphate-solubilizing, ACC-deaminase P. fluorescens (SM2) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–464 Other claims from this paper (19) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum