Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2353334158 ✕

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome: Yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 51 9%e0
Qualifier: diseaseⅡe0

Verbatim

e0
“diseaseⅡ by 51 9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–775

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome: yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 52 9%e0
Qualifier: diseaseⅡe0

Verbatim

e0
“diseaseⅡ by 52 9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–658

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome: Yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 68 4%e0
Qualifier: disease Ⅲe0

Verbatim

e0
“disease Ⅲ by 68 4%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–795

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: VerticilliumVerticilliumt0pathogen
Outcome: Yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 86 7%e0
Qualifier: disease Ⅳe0

Verbatim

e0
“disease Ⅳ by 86 7%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–815

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome: Yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 68 7%e0
Qualifier: disease Ⅲe0

Verbatim

e0
“disease Ⅲ by 68 7%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–677

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium wilt grade IV reduced cotton seed yield by 83 4%.

Taxon: CottonGossypium hirsutumt0
Interactor: FusariumFusariumt0pathogen
Outcome: Yieldt0
Direction: decreaseinferrede0
Value: 83 4%e0
Qualifier: disease Ⅳe0

Verbatim

e0
“disease Ⅳ by 83 4%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–697

t0
“Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–113

Title

Identification of Cotton Resistance to Fusarium and Verticillium Wilts and the Influence of the Diseases on Yield

Wu Zheng 2003

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation Four of 40 cotton lines were resistant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Twenty-seven cotton lines were tolerant to Fusarium wilt.
Observation Nine cotton lines were susceptible to Fusarium wilt.
Observation One of 30 cotton lines was resistant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Twenty-six cotton lines were tolerant to Verticillium wilt.
Observation Three cotton lines were susceptible to Verticillium wilt.
Association Fusarium wilt grade I reduced cotton seed yield by 32 0%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade II reduced cotton seed yield by 52 9%.
Association Fusarium wilt grade III reduced cotton seed yield by 68 7%.
Association Verticillium wilt grade I caused 30 3% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade II caused 51 9% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade III caused 68 4% yield loss.
Association Verticillium wilt grade IV caused 86 7% yield loss.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics