Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

12 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 4 non-evaluative

Over time

1990

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2344741269 ✕

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: DIe7
Outcome: fruit desirabilitye7
Direction: enhancede7
Qualifier: Despite yield reductione7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e7
“Despite yield reduction, DI enhanced fruit desirability in terms of higher concentration of soluble sugars and higher color intensity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1053

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Material: Virosae0
Treatment: deficit irrigation (DI)e0
Outcome: fruit yield, size and counte0
Direction: reducede0
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1
Setting: glasshousee0

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Outcome: CO 2 production peake6
Qualifier: preceded that of ethylenee6

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e6
“In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak preceded that of ethylene”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–918

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Material: Virosae0
Treatment: deficit irrigation (DI)e0
Outcome: plant growthe0
Direction: reducede0
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1
Setting: glasshousee0

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Material: Virosae0
Treatment: deficit irrigation (DI)e0
Outcome: blossom-end rote0
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1
Setting: glasshousee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: Deficit-irrigatede1
Outcome: color intensitye1
Direction: highere1
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: Deficit-irrigatede1
Outcome: water contente1
Direction: lowere1
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Outcome: Ethylene and CO 2 production peakse5
Qualifier: coincided for the first harvest in both treatmentse5

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e5
“Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–843

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: DIe4
Outcome: quantities of CO 2 and ethylenee4
Direction: highere4
Qualifier: For both harvestse4
Comparator: controle4

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e4
“For both harvests, DI fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–756

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher concentrations of sucrose, glucose and fructose than well-watered control fruit.

Taxon: tomatoesSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment: Deficit-irrigatede1
Outcome: concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructosee1
Direction: highere1
Comparator: well-watered (control)e1

Verbatim

e0
“In glasshouse-grown tomatoes ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. `Virosa'), deficit irrigation (DI), in which plant water potential was allowed to decrease from –0.5 to –1.2 MPa, reduced plant growth and fruit yield, size and count, and caused blossom-end rot”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255

e1
“Deficit-irrigated fruit had higher color intensity, lower water content, and higher concentration of sucrose, glucose, and fructose than well-watered (control) fruit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–422

Title

Growth, Yield, and Postharvest Attributes of Glasshouse Tomatoes Produced under Deficit Irrigation

Lucio U. Pulupol; M. Hossein Behboudian; Keith J. Fisher HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.6.926

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced plant growth of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation reduced fruit yield, fruit size and fruit count of glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation caused blossom-end rot in glasshouse tomatoes.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had higher color intensity than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit had lower water content than well-watered control fruit.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations of tomato fruit were the same under both treatments on a dry weight basis.
Intervention effect Ca, Mg and K concentrations were higher in deficit-irrigated tomato fruit than in control fruit on a fresh weight basis.
Intervention effect Deficit-irrigated tomato fruit produced higher quantities of CO 2 and ethylene than control fruit for both harvests.
Observation Ethylene and CO 2 production peaks coincided for the first harvest in both treatments of tomato fruit.
Observation In the second harvest, the CO 2 production peak of tomato fruit preceded that of ethylene.
Intervention effect Deficit irrigation enhanced tomato fruit desirability despite yield reduction.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics