View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W2229742089 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decrease d 47.45 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “47.45 per cent in L550 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 458–480 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decrease d 52.90 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “52.90 per cent in BG261 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–558 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decrease d 80.31 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “80.31 per cent in Radhey ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–637 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decrease d 82.76 per cent from normal conditions.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decrease d 60.38 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “60.38 per cent in GNG 146 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–507 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decrease d 49.87 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “49.87 per cent in ICCC 32 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–533 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decrease d 52.72 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “52.72 per cent in JG 315 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–584 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decrease d 80.95 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “80.95 per cent in BGM 413 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–611 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decrease d 64.46 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “64.46 per cent in KPG 24 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–663 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decreased 58.73 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
At ESP 20.8, KPG 70 grain yield decrease d 58.73 per cent.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “58.73 per cent in KPG 70 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–689 t0 “Chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–49 e1 “decrease in grain yield at ESP 20.8 was 82.76 per cent in Phule G5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–456 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Phule G5 grain yield decreased 82.76 per cent from normal conditions. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, L550 grain yield decreased 47.45 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, GNG 146 grain yield decreased 60.38 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, ICCC 32 grain yield decreased 49.87 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BG261 grain yield decreased 52.90 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, JG 315 grain yield decreased 52.72 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, BGM 413 grain yield decreased 80.95 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, Radhey grain yield decreased 80.31 per cent. Intervention effect At ESP 20.8, KPG 24 grain yield decreased 64.46 per cent. Intervention effect Zinc application reduced the corresponding grain yield loss for Phule G5 to 64.48 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding L550 grain yield loss was 34.28 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding GNG 146 grain yield loss was 43.13 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding ICCC 32 grain yield loss was 34.94 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BG261 grain yield loss was 36.76 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding JG 315 grain yield loss was 36.18 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding BGM 413 grain yield loss was 61.85 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding Radhey grain yield loss was 61.34 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 24 grain yield loss was 44.15 per cent. Observation With zinc application, the corresponding KPG 70 grain yield loss was 41.45 per cent. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cicer arietinumt0