Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

8 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1990

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2161514563 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: high-EC solutione0
Outcome: calciume0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–982

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Organ / stage: Foliare0
Treatment: high-EC solutione0
Outcome: manganesee0
Direction: increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Organ / stage: Foliare0
Treatment: high-EC solutione0
Outcome: nitrogen, potassium, zince0
Direction: increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: different SMP setpointse0
Outcome: Yielde0
Direction: no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Yield measurements indicated no significant effects due to different SMP setpoints”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–610

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: low-EC solution treatmentse0
Outcome: spring total yielde0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: high-EC solutiont1

Verbatim

e0
“spring total yield and average marketable fruit weight were higher for low-EC solution treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–712

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: low-EC solution treatmentse0
Outcome: average marketable fruit weighte0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: high-EC solutiont1

Verbatim

e0
“spring total yield and average marketable fruit weight were higher for low-EC solution treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–712

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: highest EC treatmente0
Outcome: Blossom-end rote0
Direction: highere0
Qualifier: in the falle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in the fall under the highest EC treatment.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–793

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.
Observation Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Outcome: EC of peat substratese0
Direction: highere0
Qualifier: even with periodic overwateringe0
Comparator: applied solutionse0

Verbatim

e0
“The EC of peat substrates was also found to be higher than applied solutions indicating an overall accumulation of salts within the peat under different irrigation regimes, even with periodic overwatering.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1189

t0
“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102

t1
“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983

Title

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1995. doi:10.4141/cjps95-087

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.
Intervention effect Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.
Intervention effect Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.
Intervention effect High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics