View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W2114444045 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran showed a smaller decrease in Harvest Index under drought than the other cultivars.
drought stress e0 the other cultivars e1 Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “In all cultivars drought stress decrease d Harvest Index at the similar level of defoliation treatments yield significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1070 e1 “but in Chamran decreasing rate was less than the other cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1135 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought reduced grain yield and thousand grain weight by 18 and 22 percent on average. Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought had no significant effect on biomass. Intervention effect Zarin and Marvdasht were more sensitive to drought stress than the other cultivars. Intervention effect Drought stress decreased Harvest Index in all cultivars. Intervention effect De-awning gave the highest grain yield, 1.77 g per spike. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest grain yield, 1.18 g per spike. Intervention effect The control treatment gave the highest thousand grain weight, 37.7 g. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest thousand grain weight, 27.2 g. Intervention effect Defoliation of the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 9.3 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 14.7 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect De-awning decreased grain yield by 4.4 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Ear shading decreased grain yield by 32.9% in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decreased grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%. Intervention effect In well-watered plants the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%. Intervention effect Under drought the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%. Mechanism Current photosynthesis of the spike contributed to grain filling more than the flag leaf and other leaves. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
De-awning decrease d grain yield by 4.4 in well-watered plants.
well watered candition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought reduced grain yield and thousand grain weight by 18 and 22 percent on average. Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought had no significant effect on biomass. Intervention effect Zarin and Marvdasht were more sensitive to drought stress than the other cultivars. Intervention effect Drought stress decreased Harvest Index in all cultivars. Intervention effect Chamran showed a smaller decrease in Harvest Index under drought than the other cultivars. Intervention effect De-awning gave the highest grain yield, 1.77 g per spike. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest grain yield, 1.18 g per spike. Intervention effect The control treatment gave the highest thousand grain weight, 37.7 g. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest thousand grain weight, 27.2 g. Intervention effect Defoliation of the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 9.3 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 14.7 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Ear shading decreased grain yield by 32.9% in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decreased grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%. Intervention effect In well-watered plants the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%. Intervention effect Under drought the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%. Mechanism Current photosynthesis of the spike contributed to grain filling more than the flag leaf and other leaves. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading decrease d grain yield by 32.9% in well-watered plants.
ear shaded treatmants e0 well watered candition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought reduced grain yield and thousand grain weight by 18 and 22 percent on average. Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought had no significant effect on biomass. Intervention effect Zarin and Marvdasht were more sensitive to drought stress than the other cultivars. Intervention effect Drought stress decreased Harvest Index in all cultivars. Intervention effect Chamran showed a smaller decrease in Harvest Index under drought than the other cultivars. Intervention effect De-awning gave the highest grain yield, 1.77 g per spike. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest grain yield, 1.18 g per spike. Intervention effect The control treatment gave the highest thousand grain weight, 37.7 g. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest thousand grain weight, 27.2 g. Intervention effect Defoliation of the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 9.3 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 14.7 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect De-awning decreased grain yield by 4.4 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decreased grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%. Intervention effect In well-watered plants the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%. Intervention effect Under drought the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%. Mechanism Current photosynthesis of the spike contributed to grain filling more than the flag leaf and other leaves. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation of the flag leaf decrease d grain yield by 9.3 in well-watered plants.
defoliation of flag leaf e0 well watered candition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought reduced grain yield and thousand grain weight by 18 and 22 percent on average. Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought had no significant effect on biomass. Intervention effect Zarin and Marvdasht were more sensitive to drought stress than the other cultivars. Intervention effect Drought stress decreased Harvest Index in all cultivars. Intervention effect Chamran showed a smaller decrease in Harvest Index under drought than the other cultivars. Intervention effect De-awning gave the highest grain yield, 1.77 g per spike. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest grain yield, 1.18 g per spike. Intervention effect The control treatment gave the highest thousand grain weight, 37.7 g. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest thousand grain weight, 27.2 g. Intervention effect Defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 14.7 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect De-awning decreased grain yield by 4.4 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Ear shading decreased grain yield by 32.9% in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decreased grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%. Intervention effect In well-watered plants the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%. Intervention effect Under drought the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%. Mechanism Current photosynthesis of the spike contributed to grain filling more than the flag leaf and other leaves. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf decrease d grain yield by 14.7 in well-watered plants.
defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf e0 well watered candition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought reduced grain yield and thousand grain weight by 18 and 22 percent on average. Intervention effect Post-anthesis drought had no significant effect on biomass. Intervention effect Zarin and Marvdasht were more sensitive to drought stress than the other cultivars. Intervention effect Drought stress decreased Harvest Index in all cultivars. Intervention effect Chamran showed a smaller decrease in Harvest Index under drought than the other cultivars. Intervention effect De-awning gave the highest grain yield, 1.77 g per spike. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest grain yield, 1.18 g per spike. Intervention effect The control treatment gave the highest thousand grain weight, 37.7 g. Intervention effect Ear shading gave the lowest thousand grain weight, 27.2 g. Intervention effect Defoliation of the flag leaf decreased grain yield by 9.3 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect De-awning decreased grain yield by 4.4 in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Ear shading decreased grain yield by 32.9% in well-watered plants. Intervention effect Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decreased grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%. Intervention effect In well-watered plants the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%. Intervention effect Under drought the same four treatments decreased thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%. Mechanism Current photosynthesis of the spike contributed to grain filling more than the flag leaf and other leaves. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, the four defoliation and shading treatments decrease d grain yield by 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1%.
defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants e0 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% e0 drought stress candition e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought the same four treatments decrease d thousand grain weight by 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2%.
defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants e0 thousand grain weight e1 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2% e1 drought stress candition e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 e1 “But on the thousand grain weight due to decrease 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2% in the well watered candition and 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1967 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In well-watered plants the same four treatments decrease d thousand grain weight by 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2%.
defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants e0 thousand grain weight e1 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2% e1 well watered candition e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter bread wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–133 e0 “Results showed that the effect defoliation of flag leaf, defoliation of all leaves except the flag leaf, de-awning and ear shaded treatmants on the grain yield due to decrease 9.3, 14.7, 4.4 and 32.9% in the well watered candition, also 13.4, 8.5, 5.8 and 27.1% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1803 e1 “But on the thousand grain weight due to decrease 2.2, 3.9, 0.2 and 30.2% in the well watered candition and 7.1, 3.5, 2.3 and 25.2% in the drought stress candition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1967 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivum