Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

7 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 4 non-evaluative

Over time

2000

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2079890389 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: Nutrient applicatione7
Outcome: heighte7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 2.1%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no fertilizere3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: Nutrient applicatione7
Outcome: percent dry mattere7
Direction: decreasee7
Value: 5.5%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no fertilizere3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: shadee3
Outcome: yielde7
Direction: increasede7
Value: 63.4%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no shadee3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: Nutrient applicatione7
Outcome: yielde7
Direction: increasede7
Value: 10.4%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no fertilizere3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: Irrigatione7
Direction: no effecte7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no irrigatione3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Not reportedOutcome

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: shadee3
Outcome: heighte7
Direction: increasede7
Value: 52.3%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no shadee3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade decreased percent dry matter by 22.6% at the second harvest.

Taxon: American skullcape1
Treatment: shadee3
Outcome: percent dry mattere7
Direction: decreasede7
Value: 22.6%e7
Qualifier: At second harveste7
Comparator: no shadee3
Setting: Shorter, Alabamae2

Verbatim

e1
“American skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

e2
“was established in Shorter, Alabama”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–384

e3
“Treatment factors were shade (40% shade vs. no shade), irrigation (applied at 30 kPa vs. no irrigation) and nutrients (no fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–604

e7
“At second harvest, shade increased yield by 63.4%, height by 52.3% and decreased percent dry matter by 22.6%. Irrigation had no effect. Nutrient application increased yield by 10.4%, decrease height by 2.1% and percent dry matter by 5.5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1469

Title

Shade, Irrigation and Fertility Effects on Biomass Production and Flavonoid Content in American skullcap

A Similien; DA Shannon; CW Wood; et al. Planta Medica 2008. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1075201

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Shade did not affect biomass yield at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 33% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade decreased percent dry matter by 14.5% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased biomass yield by 23.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation increased plant height by 12.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation decreased percent dry matter by 8.3% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 45.7% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased plant height by 9.9% at the first harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased biomass yield by 63.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Shade increased plant height by 52.3% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Irrigation had no effect at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application increased biomass yield by 10.4% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased plant height by 2.1% at the second harvest.
Intervention effect Nutrient application decreased percent dry matter by 5.5% at the second harvest.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics