View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W2070093812 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d yield per plants by 89.04–99.89%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomeyield per plants e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “89.04–99.89% decrease in yield per plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1193 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d root length by 11.47–52.65%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “11.47–52.65% decrease in root length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–917 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d fresh plant weight by 46.56–95.56%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomefresh plant weight e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “46.56–95.56% decrease in fresh plant weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–962 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d root fresh weight by 65.78–92.84%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomeroot fresh weight e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “65.78–92.84% decrease in root fresh weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1006 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d dry root weight by 75.63–95.43%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “75.63–95.43% decrease in dry root weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1099 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d plant height by 0.97–30.19%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “All the test genotypes exhibited 0.97–30.19% decrease in plant height ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–879 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d dry weight of plants by 19.97–87.65%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomedry weight of plants e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “19.97–87.65% decrease in the dry weight of plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1057 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
CMV inoculation decrease d number of fruits by 69.51–95.65%.
Treatmentinoculated with CMV e1 Outcomenumber of fruits e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Ten tomato genotypes were screened for their resistance against cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–100 e1 “Plants inoculated with CMV showed substantial decrease in yield and yield -contributing parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–732 e2 “69.51–95.65% reduction in the number of fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1147 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.