Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

6 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

2010

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

paper W2036291679 ✕

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: decrease in the amount of precipitatione4
Outcome: maize yielde5
Direction: reductione5
Value: 6, 12 and 3%e5
Qualifier: respectivelye5
Comparator: present climatee5

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e4
“minimal temperature and maximal temperature (×1·07, 2 and 4°C, respectively), but a decrease in the amount of precipitation (×0·92)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1494

e5
“The reduction of maize yield was caused by the increase in minimal and maximal temperature and the decrease in precipitation amount, related to the present climate, is 6, 12 and 3%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1744

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.
Observation Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: maize yielde3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 216 kg/hae3
Qualifier: in 10 yearse3

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e3
“It also shows a decrease in biomass by 122 kg/ha and in maize yield by 216 kg/ha in 10 years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1050

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: Simultaneous application of all these climate changese1
Outcome: maize yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e1
“Simultaneous application of all these climate changes suggested that the maize growth period would shorten by c. 1 month”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1923–2043

e0
“maize yield would decrease by 9%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2048–2080

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.
Observation Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: minimal temperaturee4
Outcome: maize yielde5
Direction: reductione5
Value: 6, 12 and 3%e5
Qualifier: respectivelye5
Comparator: present climatee5

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e4
“minimal temperature and maximal temperature (×1·07, 2 and 4°C, respectively), but a decrease in the amount of precipitation (×0·92)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1494

e5
“The reduction of maize yield was caused by the increase in minimal and maximal temperature and the decrease in precipitation amount, related to the present climate, is 6, 12 and 3%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1744

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.
Observation Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: maximal temperaturee4
Outcome: maize yielde5
Direction: reductione5
Value: 6, 12 and 3%e5
Qualifier: respectivelye5
Comparator: present climatee5

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e4
“minimal temperature and maximal temperature (×1·07, 2 and 4°C, respectively), but a decrease in the amount of precipitation (×0·92)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1494

e5
“The reduction of maize yield was caused by the increase in minimal and maximal temperature and the decrease in precipitation amount, related to the present climate, is 6, 12 and 3%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1550–1744

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.
Observation Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass decreased by 122 kg/ha in 10 years.

Taxon: maizeZea mayst0
Outcome: biomasse3
Direction: decreasee3
Value: 122 kg/hae3
Qualifier: in 10 yearse3

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling of maize production in Croatia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40

e3
“It also shows a decrease in biomass by 122 kg/ha and in maize yield by 216 kg/ha in 10 years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1050

Title

Modelling of maize production in Croatia: present and future climate

V. VUČETIĆ The Journal of Agricultural Science 2010. doi:10.1017/s0021859610000808

Other claims from this paper (12)

Observation The beginning of maize silking advanced significantly by 1·4 days per decade.
Observation Maturity advanced by 4·5 days per decade.
Observation Maize yield decreased by 216 kg/ha in 10 years.
Intervention effect Minimal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 6% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Maximal temperature increase reduces maize yield by 12% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Decrease in precipitation reduces maize yield by 3% relative to the present climate.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration raises maize yield only 1% above the present level.
Intervention effect Doubling CO2 concentration stimulates leaf assimilation of maize.
Association Global solar radiation growth by 7% increases evapotranspiration by 3%.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes shortens the maize growth period by about 1 month.
Intervention effect Simultaneous application of the climate changes decreases maize yield by 9%.
Mechanism Extremely warm future conditions are the main reason for the maize yield reduction in Croatia.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics