View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W1984111984 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling decrease d sucrose content in chickpea leaves during seed filling.
The chilling conditions e1 warm conditions (control) e2 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The chilling conditions resulted in the increase in electrolyte leakage, the loss of chlorophyll, the decrease in sucrose content and the reduction in water status in leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1309 e2 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Chilling increased electrolyte leakage in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling caused loss of chlorophyll in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased total plant weight of chickpea to the same level in both types. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased seed size, seed weight and pods per plant, most in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased the rate and duration of seed filling in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased harvest index in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed protein fraction accumulation. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose accumulation in chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Chilling decreased seed starch synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activity levels. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered calcium, phosphorus and iron in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered phenylalanine, tyrosine and threonine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered tryptophan, valine and histidine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling caused loss of chlorophyll in chickpea leaves during seed filling.
The chilling conditions e1 loss of chlorophyll e1 decrease inferred e1 warm conditions (control) e2 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The chilling conditions resulted in the increase in electrolyte leakage, the loss of chlorophyll, the decrease in sucrose content and the reduction in water status in leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1309 e2 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Chilling increased electrolyte leakage in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose content in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased total plant weight of chickpea to the same level in both types. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased seed size, seed weight and pods per plant, most in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased the rate and duration of seed filling in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased harvest index in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed protein fraction accumulation. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose accumulation in chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Chilling decreased seed starch synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activity levels. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered calcium, phosphorus and iron in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered phenylalanine, tyrosine and threonine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered tryptophan, valine and histidine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling increased electrolyte leakage in chickpea leaves during seed filling.
The chilling conditions e1 electrolyte leakage e1 warm conditions (control) e2 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The chilling conditions resulted in the increase in electrolyte leakage, the loss of chlorophyll, the decrease in sucrose content and the reduction in water status in leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1309 e2 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Chilling caused loss of chlorophyll in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose content in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased total plant weight of chickpea to the same level in both types. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased seed size, seed weight and pods per plant, most in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased the rate and duration of seed filling in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased harvest index in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed protein fraction accumulation. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose accumulation in chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Chilling decreased seed starch synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activity levels. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered calcium, phosphorus and iron in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered phenylalanine, tyrosine and threonine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered tryptophan, valine and histidine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold conditions reduced seed protein fraction accumulation.
cold conditions of the field e2 protein fractions (albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins) e1 warm conditions (control) e3 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The stressed seeds of both the chickpea types experienced marked reduction in the accumulation of starch, proteins, fats, crude fibre, protein fractions (albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins) with a larger decrease in the macrocarpa type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1872 e2 “was subjected to cold conditions of the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1013 e3 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect Chilling increased electrolyte leakage in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling caused loss of chlorophyll in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose content in chickpea leaves during seed filling. Intervention effect Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased total plant weight of chickpea to the same level in both types. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased seed size, seed weight and pods per plant, most in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased the rate and duration of seed filling in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions decreased harvest index in the macrocarpa chickpea type. Intervention effect Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type. Intervention effect Chilling decreased sucrose accumulation in chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Chilling decreased seed starch synthase, sucrose synthase and invertase activity levels. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered calcium, phosphorus and iron in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered phenylalanine, tyrosine and threonine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect Cold conditions lowered tryptophan, valine and histidine in stressed chickpea seeds. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Chilling reduced leaf water status in chickpea, more in the macrocarpa type.
macrocarpa type e2 The chilling conditions e1 water status in leaves e1 greater extent in the macrocarpa type e2 warm conditions (control) e3 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The chilling conditions resulted in the increase in electrolyte leakage, the loss of chlorophyll, the decrease in sucrose content and the reduction in water status in leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1309 e2 “which occurred to a greater extent in the macrocarpa type than in the microcarpa type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1396 e3 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Cold conditions reduced seed starch, protein, fat and crude fibre accumulation, more in the macrocarpa type.
cold conditions of the field e2 accumulation of starch, proteins, fats, crude fibre e1 warm conditions (control) e3 Verbatim
e0 “Chickpea is sensitive to cold conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 e1 “The stressed seeds of both the chickpea types experienced marked reduction in the accumulation of starch, proteins, fats, crude fibre, protein fractions (albumins, globulins, prolamins and glutelins) with a larger decrease in the macrocarpa type ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1627–1872 e2 “was subjected to cold conditions of the field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1013 e3 “another set was maintained under warm conditions (control) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1134 Other claims from this paper (14) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Cicer arietinum