View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper paper W1564234094 ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
Treatmentsulphur dioxide treatment e0 Outcomeyield of alfalfa e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Qualifierunder none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under some conditions sulphur dioxide significantly increased alfalfa yield .
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e0 Qualifierunder some of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under some of the conditions it brought about significant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–662 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield .
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e0 Directionno significant effect e1 Qualifierunder most of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant age and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the alfalfa yield response to sulphur dioxide.
Treatmentamount of supplied nutrients e1 Outcomeyield response to the gas treatment e1 QualifierAge of plants and the amount of supplied nutrients e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “Age of plants and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the yield response to the gas treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–905 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide treatment significantly increased the total sulphur content of alfalfa.
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e1 Outcomeper cent total sulphur e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “treatment with sulphur dioxide brought about significant increases in per cent total sulphur ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1505 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur deficiency in the nutrient supply was compensated by sulphur dioxide absorbed from the air in alfalfa.
Compoundsulphur dioxide e1 Outcomedeficiencies in sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “deficiencies in sulphur content of nutrient supply were made up by absorption of sulphur dioxide from the air ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–796 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither sulphur dioxide, water supply nor sulphur content of the nutrient supply affected alfalfa nitrogen content.
Treatmentsulphur dioxide e1 Outcomenitrogen content e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Qualifierwater supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “neither sulphur dioxide, water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply had significant effect on nitrogen content of the alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1785 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Rapidly growing alfalfa under favorable light responded more readily to the growth effect of sulphur dioxide than slowly growing alfalfa under less favorable light.
Treatmentfavorable light conditions e1 Comparatorless favorable light conditions e2 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “Alfalfa growing rapidly under favorable light conditions responded more readily to the growth effect ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1184 e2 “than did alfalfa growing slowly under less favorable light conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1267 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa grown with a deficient water supply responded more readily to the stimulating effect of sulphur dioxide than alfalfa with an ample water supply.
Treatmentdeficient supply of water e1 Outcomestimulating effect of the sulphur dioxide e1 Comparatorample water supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “Alfalfa grown with a deficient supply of water seemed to respond more readily to the stimulating effect of the sulphur dioxide than did plants grown with an ample water supply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1082 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.