View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A risk of severe yield decrease in CSS could not be shown in the limited experiments.
risk of severe yield decrease e4 in our limited experiments e4 Verbatim
e0 “such as timothy ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 152–167 e4 “A risk of severe yield decrease in CSS could not be shown in our limited experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–991 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Short-term conservation tillage did not significantly decrease corn yield .
short-term implementation of conservation tillage e0 did not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the short-term implementation of conservation tillage did not result in a significant decrease in corn yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1920–2029 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Microgreen yield did not decrease under the intermittent lighting schedule.
Intermittent LED lighting t0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At the same time, the yield does not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–444 t0 “Intermittent LED lighting helps reduce energy costs when growing microgreens on vertical controlled environment farms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–117 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Industrial tomato yield did not decrease at salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1).
industrial tomatoes e0 salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) e0 without any decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “industrial tomatoes could be grown in salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) without any decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1022 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Use of a herbicide allowed a lower seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield .
Use of a herbicide e3 sericea stand or forage yield e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Establishment of Sericea Lespedeza ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–34 e3 “Use of a herbicide permitted a reduction in seeding rate with no decrease in sericea stand or forage yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–414 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.
no corresponding decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield s of maize, cotton and soybean decrease d sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360 t0 “mimosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
White-sugar yield did not decrease under sodium application.
white‐sugar yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “ultimately there was no decrease in white‐sugar yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1293 t0 “sodium in sugar beet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–46 e1 “growth and quality of sugar beet were not affected by Na application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1166–1234 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing density from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield .
six plants per meter e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The reduction from 12 to six plants per meter did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1293 t0 “common bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–35 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Tine cultivation did not decrease winter wheat yield .
Tine cultivation e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Tine cultivation incorporated less straw than ploughing, decrease d plant establishment and early growth but did not decrease yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–674 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–111 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pod yield under well-watered conditions did not decrease under high-temperature conditions.
high‐temperature conditions e3 Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions e3 did not decrease e3 Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Groundnut under Combined Heat and Drought Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–62 e3 “Pod yield under well‐watered (WW) conditions did not decrease under high‐temperature conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1293 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Phleum pratensee0
Zea mays subsp. mays
Lespedeza cuneata
Mimosa
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris
Triticum aestivum
Arachis hypogaea