Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

U-PBP did not affect final production of common bean.

Taxon: beane5
Treatment: U-PBPe5
Outcome: final productione5
Direction: without affectinge5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e5
“The elicitation of bean defense with U-PBP involved a decrease in some yield parameters, but without affecting the final production”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1314

Title

Using Plant-Based Preparations to Protect Common Bean against Halo Blight Disease: The Potential of Nettle to Trigger the Immune System

Alfonso Gonzalo De la Rubia; María De Castro; Inés Medina-Lozano; et al. Agronomy 2021. doi:10.3390/agronomy12010063

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect The two most effective plant-based preparations (RG and U) inhibited Pph growth in bioassays.
Intervention effect U-PBP application involved a signaling redox process in common bean.
Intervention effect U-PBP application caused overexpression of all six defence genes, mostly PR1, in common bean.
Intervention effect U-PBP application suggested protection of common bean against Pph in first in vitro infection trials.
Intervention effect U-PBP decreased some yield parameters of common bean.
Recommendation The authors suggest a future use of U-PBP to diminish halo blight disease in beans.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The double mutation had no drastic impact on plant growth.

Taxon: Brachypodium distachyonBrachypodium distachyont0
Material: double mutatione0
Outcome: plant growthe0
Direction: no drastic impacte0

Verbatim

e0
“there is no drastic impact of the double mutation on plant growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–977

t0
“Brachypodium distachyon”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70

Title

Inactivation of LACCASE8 and LACCASE5 genes in Brachypodium distachyon leads to severe decrease in lignin content and high increase in saccharification yield without impacting plant integrity

Philippe Le Bris; Yin Wang; Clément Barbereau; et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2019. doi:10.1186/s13068-019-1525-5

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Double laccase inactivation reduced mature culm lignin content by 20–30% versus wild type.
Intervention effect Double laccase inactivation increased saccharification yield by 140% versus wild type.
Intervention effect Ferulic acid release after mild alkaline hydrolysis was 2.5-fold higher in the double mutant.
Observation Interfascicular fibers were primarily affected by the double mutation.
Observation Vascular bundle integrity was not impaired by the double mutation.
Mechanism Two Brachypodium laccases were implicated in lignification.
Observation Interfascicular fiber and metaxylem cell lignification were partly uncoupled.
Recommendation Orthologs of these laccases were proposed as targets to improve grass biofuel feedstock.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mandatory second fungicide application did not improve root yield or recoverable sucrose.

Taxon: sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
Treatment: mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first applicatione3
Outcome: root yield or recoverable sucrosee3
Direction: improvee3
Comparator: treatments without the mandatory applicatione3

Verbatim

e0
“Management of Cercospora leaf spot, caused by Cercospora beticola, is necessary for the economic production of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–137

e3
“The mandatory second fungicide application 14 days after the first application for southern areas did not significantly decrease disease severity or AUDPC, or improve root yield or recoverable sucrose compared with treatments without the mandatory application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1284

Title

Improving the Cercospora Leaf Spot Management Model for Sugar Beet in Minnesota and North Dakota

J. Khan; L. E. del Río; R. Nelson; et al. Plant Disease 2007. doi:10.1094/pdis-91-9-1105

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Imazapyre0
Outcome: soybean injurye0
Direction: did not increasee0
Comparator: chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0
“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased johnsongrass control after eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased pitted morningglory control after eight weeks.
Observation Enhancing johnsongrass control required higher imazethapyr or imazaquin rates than enhancing pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled johnsongrass at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither sulphur dioxide, water supply nor sulphur content of the nutrient supply affected alfalfa nitrogen content.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment: sulphur dioxidee1
Outcome: nitrogen contente1
Direction: no_changeinferrede1
Qualifier: water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supplye1

Verbatim

e0
“Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515

e1
“neither sulphur dioxide, water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply had significant effect on nitrogen content of the alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1785

Title

Effect of low concentrations of sulphur dioxide on yield of alfalfa and cruciferae

C. Setterstrom; P. W. Zimmerman; William Crocker OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1938

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

10 NS treatment had polyphenol contents similar to 20 NS in spinach microgreens.

Taxon: spinach microgreense3
Treatment: 10 NS treatmente3
Outcome: polyphenol contentse3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Comparator: 20 NS treatmente3

Verbatim

e3
“spinach microgreens subjected to 10 NS treatment recorded 70.7% less nitrates, better mineral concentrations, 7.0% higher total ascorbic acid, similar polyphenol contents, higher DM%, and only 12.6% yield decrease compared to 20 NS treatment”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1302

Title

The Effects of Nutrient Solution Feeding Regime on Yield, Mineral Profile, and Phytochemical Composition of Spinach Microgreens

Spyridon A. Petropoulos; Christophe El-Nakhel; Giulia Graziani; et al. Horticulturae 2021. doi:10.3390/horticulturae7070162

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Prolonged nutrient solution feeding (20 NS) gave the highest fresh yield of spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect Prolonged nutrient solution feeding (20 NS) gave the highest photosynthetic pigment contents (chlorophylls, lutein and β-carotene).
Intervention effect 20 NS gave the lowest mineral concentrations (P, K, Ca and Mg) in spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect The control (0 NS) and 5 NS gave the highest mineral concentrations (P, K, Ca and Mg) in spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect 10 NS treatment had 70.7% less nitrates than 20 NS in spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect 10 NS treatment gave better mineral concentrations than 20 NS in spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect 10 NS treatment had 7.0% higher total ascorbic acid than 20 NS.
Intervention effect 10 NS treatment had higher DM% than 20 NS in spinach microgreens.
Intervention effect 10 NS treatment reduced yield by only 12.6% compared with 20 NS.
Recommendation 10 NS treatment is the most promising option for spinach microgreens, combining high yields with high mineral and low nitrate concentrations.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N did not affect the number of marketable pepper fruit in Trial 1.

Taxon: PEPPERSCapsicumt0
Treatment: increasing Ne1
Outcome: number of marketable fruit producede1
Direction: did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“PEPPERS GROWN IN ROCKWOOL”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–94

e1
“In Trial 1, increasing N did not affect the number of marketable fruit produced, but increased fruit size.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–680

Title

NITROGEN CONCENTRATIONS TO MAXIMIZE YIELD AND DECREASE LEACHATE-N IN PEPPERS GROWN IN ROCKWOOL.

M.K. Schon; M.S. Compton; I. Burns; et al. HortScience 1993. doi:10.21273/hortsci.28.5.507a

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Increasing N increased the size of pepper fruit in Trial 1.
Intervention effect Marketable fruit weight was significantly greater with Treatment 3 than with Treatment 1.
Intervention effect Marketable yield did not differ significantly between 120 ppm N and 175 ppm N.
Intervention effect Nitrogen level did not affect blossom end rot occurrence in peppers.
Association Higher N concentration was associated with a higher occurrence of blossom end rot in early Trial 2 results.
Recommendation The authors recommend 120 ppm N to maximize yield and reduce environmental impact of greenhouse pepper production in Florida.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing bud numbers did not change fruit quality.

Taxon: red raspberryRubus idaeust0
Treatment: reduction in bud numbers per meter of hedgerowe0
Outcome: fruit qualitye0
Direction: no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“reduction in bud numbers per meter of hedgerow led to a significant decrease in fruit yield, with no changes in fruit quality”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1442

t0
“red raspberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–106

Title

Precision cane meristem management can influence productivity and fruit quality of floricane red raspberry cultivars

Aleksandar ŽIVOTIĆ; Nikola MIĆIĆ; Mirjana ŽABIĆ; et al. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY 2019. doi:10.3906/tar-1807-15

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect A 100-bud load produced high stable yields.
Observation Meeker yield ranged from 22.6 to 24.9 t/ha.
Observation Tulameen yield ranged from 17.7 to 24.5 t/ha.
Observation Willamette yield varied from 10.4 to 21.8 t/ha across years.
Intervention effect Fruit size was largest with 100 buds per meter.
Observation Fruit biochemical composition and antioxidant capacity differed among cultivars and years.
Recommendation The authors identified 100 mixed buds per meter as optimal.
Intervention effect Reducing bud numbers decreased fruit yield significantly.
Intervention effect Increasing bud numbers reduced fruit quality.
Intervention effect Increasing bud numbers did not adversely affect yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat had no effect on germination within the appropriate concentration range.

Taxon: Medicago sativaMedicago sativat0
Treatment: Paraquate0
Outcome: germination ratee0
Direction: no effecte0
Qualifier: within the appropriate concentration rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Paraquat did not decrease the seed yield and thousand-seed weight,and had no effect on germination rate within the appropriate concentration range.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–690

t0
“Medicago sativa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–88

Title

Effects of Drying Reagents on Seed Harvest and Production Performance of Medicago sativa

Zheng‐Wei Wang Anhui nongye kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Paraquat concentrations increased relative water loss in alfalfa stems and leaves above 50%.
Intervention effect Paraquat accelerated alfalfa drying.
Intervention effect Paraquat did not decrease alfalfa seed yield or thousand-seed weight.
Intervention effect K2CO3 significantly increased alfalfa leaf loss.
Intervention effect At 5% K2CO3, stem and leaf water loss reached 16.58%.
Intervention effect K2CO3 had no adverse effect on seed yield or quality.
Intervention effect Na2SO4 increased alfalfa seed yield.
Intervention effect Na2SO4 dried alfalfa less effectively than K2CO3.
Intervention effect CaCl2 had effects similar to K2CO3 but lower overall drying effectiveness.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Se-Zn had no significant effect on POD activity.

Taxon: alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment: Se-Zne0
Outcome: PODe0
Direction: no significantly effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Se-Zn could markedly improve the activities of GSH-Px and CAT,and decrease the activity of SOD,but had no significantly effect on POD”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–696

e1
“alfalfa leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 253–267

Title

Effect of Se-Zn and Fulvic Acid Combined Application on Antioxidant Enzyme Activities and Forage Yield of Alfalfa

Tian Chun-l 2014

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combined Se-Zn and FA treatment maximized leaf GSH-Px, POD and CAT activities.
Intervention effect Combined Se-Zn and FA treatment minimized leaf SOD activity.
Intervention effect Combined Se-Zn and FA application enhanced alfalfa oxidation resistance.
Intervention effect Se-Zn markedly improved GSH-Px and CAT activities.
Intervention effect Se-Zn decreased SOD activity.
Intervention effect FA significantly enhanced GSH-Px, SOD and POD activities.
Intervention effect Se-Zn alone increased alfalfa yield.
Intervention effect FA alone increased alfalfa yield more than Se-Zn alone.
Intervention effect Combined Se-Zn and FA treatment gave the highest first cut yield, 16.28t/hm2, 37.97% above CK.
Intervention effect Combined Se-Zn and FA treatment gave second cut yield of 7.59t/hm2, 33.63% above CK.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics