View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pb content of BP don't change considerably with chicken manure.
chicken manure e0 don't change considerably e0 Verbatim
e0 “As and Zn contents increase with applying chicken manure, Cr and Cd contents decrease , Pb contents don't change considerably ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1086 t0 “Brassica parachinensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–56 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher N rates showed no evidence of decreasing hay or grain quality.
higher rates of N e0 hay or grain quality e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “oats ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 e0 “There was no evidence that higher rates of N or K decrease hay or grain quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–555 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
IPM had no notable adverse effect on maize yield stability compared with conventional methods.
IPM techniques e1 no_change inferred e2 no notable adverse effects e2 conventional methods e2 Verbatim
e0 “Maize is a critical staple crop in Tanzanian agriculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–56 e1 “A randomized controlled trial was conducted in two Tanzanian regions, where IPM techniques were applied compared to conventional farming methods ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–280 e2 “There was a statistically significant decrease ($p < 0.05$) in maize pest infestations by 30% (95% confidence interval: -25 to -36%) compared to conventional methods, with no notable adverse effects on yield stability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–623 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
On a leaf-area basis, quantum yield , light compensation point and light saturation point did not change significantly.
increasing DLI e2 α, LCP, and the light saturation point (LSP) e0 did not change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “On a leaf area basis, α, LCP, and the light saturation point (LSP) did not change significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1033 e1 “wax begonia ( Begonia semperflorens-cultorum Hort.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–323 e2 “There was a small decrease in leaf chlorophyll concentration (6.3%, measured in SPAD units) with increasing DLI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1226 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Abscisic acid did not affect the CO2 compensation point at saturating irradiance.
CO2 compensation point e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “soybean leaves simultaneously decrease d quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency. These decrease s were proportional to the accompanying decrease of light-saturated photosynthetic rate under normal atmosphere. ABA did not affect the CO2 compensation point at saturating irradiance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 59–340 e1 “Injecting abscisic acid (ABA) into the petiole of attached soybean leaves simultaneously decrease d quantum yield and carboxylation efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–141 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The summer maize yield response to N rate under Treatment B was not significant.
summer maize yields e4 Verbatim
e0 “root distributions and N utilization efficiency of summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–244 e4 “With increases in N application rate, the effect on summer maize yield s increase under Treatment B were not significantly, and only BN3 increased by 0.4%, while under Treatments S were found to first increase, and then decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1175 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Removing 50% of Valencia leaves did not affect Brix or Brix-to-acid ratio.
removal of 50% of the leaves e0 Brix or the Brix to acid ratio of the juice e0 did not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In `Valencia', removal of 50% of the leaves in late March decrease d fruit yield and soluble solids yield but did not affect Brix or the Brix to acid ratio of the juice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–652 t0 “Orange Tree ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Thinning beyond 18 cm did not significantly change fruit weight or quality.
‘Redspur Delicious’ apple e0 t0 e1 thinning fruit further than 18 cm apart e0 t0 e1 fruit weight or quality e0 t0 e1 without a significant change e0 t0 e1 18 cm fruit spacing e0 t0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “thinning fruit further than 18 cm apart reduced yield without a significant change in the fruit weight or quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–1042 t0 “‘Redspur Delicious’ apple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–112 e1 “Fruit weight and quality was improved with 18 cm fruit spacing without a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–921 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.
Spraying cobalt sulfate e2 molybdenum,iron,manganese e3 no significant influence e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480 e2 “Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase cobalt and zinc contents, decrease boron and selenium contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–714 e3 “had no significant influence on molybdenum,iron,manganese and copper contents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–796 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Over 2–5 months of storage, moisture loss did not affect seed length.
2–5 months storage period e2 did not affect e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Effects of Storage-Induced Moisture Loss on Germination Performance and Oil Yield of Pongamia pinnata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 e2 “during the 2–5 months storage period, the decrease in moisture content was only 2–5% and did not affect seed length ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1159 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Brassica rapa var. parachinensist0
Avena sativa
Zea mays
Begonia
Glycine max
Medicago sativa_near_Hyderabad_W_IMG_7633.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Pongamia pinnata