Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“yield decrease”

972 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 6 earlier · 1930s

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

When lodging developed steadily, effects of mixtures on grain yield were comparable to those of growth regulators.

Taxon: winter barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: mixturese6
Outcome: grain yieldse6
Direction: comparablee6
Qualifier: When lodging developed steadilye6
Comparator: growth regulatorse6
Setting: field experimentse0

Verbatim

e0
“The potential of selected cultivar mixtures to decrease lodging and consequently improve yields in winter barley was examined in field experiments at two locations over 2 years”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–184

e6
“When lodging developed steadily, effects of mixtures on grain yields were comparable to those of growth regulators”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1020

Title

Effects of winter barley cultivar mixtures on lodging

H. Stützel; W. Aufhammer The Journal of Agricultural Science 1989. doi:10.1017/s0021859600084094

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Use of cultivar mixtures tended to reduce initial lodging in winter barley.
Intervention effect With increasing lodging, desired mixture effects prevailed in mixtures of highly susceptible and highly resistant cultivars.
Intervention effect On average, the yield advantage of mixtures over pure stands was small.
Intervention effect The yield advantage of mixtures over pure stands was greater when lodging decreased the yield of a pure cultivar.
Intervention effect Reductions in lodging prevailed in two-component mixtures.
Intervention effect Adding more components to mixtures was of no advantage over two-component mixtures.
Intervention effect When lodging was caused suddenly by a thunderstorm, only growth regulator applications improved yield.
Intervention effect Growth regulators gave yield advantages in two of the four trials only.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide application did not significantly increase baby lima bean pod yield despite reduced tan spot

Taxon: baby lima beane0
Treatment: fungicidese2
Outcome: pod yielde2
Direction: significant increasese2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Four small-plot, replicated trials were conducted over 2 years in commercial baby lima bean fields to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides for tan spot control at Piffard and Leicester, NY”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–721

e2
“Despite the decrease in tan spot incidence and corresponding increase in crop health obtained from fungicides, this effect did not translate into significant increases in pod yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1216

Title

Spatiotemporal Attributes and Crop Loss Associated with Tan Spot Epidemics in Baby Lima Bean in New York

Sarah J. Pethybridge; Frank S. Hay; Adrienne Gorny; et al. Plant Disease 2017. doi:10.1094/pdis-07-17-1096-re

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Removing 25% of canopy leaves had no measured effects.

Taxon: oranget0
Treatment: removing 25% of leavese0
Outcome: no measured effectse0
Direction: no measured effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“There were no measured effects of removing 25% of leaves from tree canopies”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–864

t0
“Orange Tree”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87

Title

Partial Defoliation Can Decrease Average Leaf Size but Has Little Effect on Orange Tree Growth, Fruit Yield and Juice Quality

Rongcai Yuan; Fernando Alferez; Igor Kostenyuk; et al. HortScience 2005. doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2011

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin yield, fruit number or fruit size.
Intervention effect Up to 50% leaf removal did not change Hamlin soluble solids yield or juice measures.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves decreased fruit yield and soluble solids yield.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of Valencia leaves did not affect Brix or Brix-to-acid ratio.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of leaves reduced new-flush leaf size in both cultivars.
Intervention effect Removing 50% of leaves had little effect on canopy size.
Association Fruit weight increased with leaf area per fruit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress did not alter antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon: LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment: Salt stresse1
Outcome: antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction: without alteringe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“without altering antioxidant enzyme activities.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1185

e1
“Salt stress triggered a decrease in fresh yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1011

t0
“Lettuce Tolerance to Alkalinity and Salinity”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–146

Title

Synergistic Action of a Microbial-based Biostimulant and a Plant Derived-Protein Hydrolysate Enhances Lettuce Tolerance to Alkalinity and Salinity

Youssef Rouphael; Mariateresa Cardarelli; Paolo Bonini; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2017. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00131

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Salt stress reduced lettuce fresh yield, biomass, SPAD index, chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf mineral composition.
Intervention effect Salt stress increased leaf proline concentration.
Intervention effect Alkali stress produced a nonsignificant decline in marketable yield and biomass.
Intervention effect Tablet increased marketable yield and shoot and root dry weight across nutrient solutions.
Intervention effect Tablet plus PH increased marketable yield and shoot and root dry weight across nutrient solutions.
Association Biostimulant application improved SPAD index and Fv/Fm ratio.
Association Biostimulant application improved CAT and GPX activities.
Association Biostimulant application was associated with higher P, K and Fe and lower Na under NaCl.
Association Biostimulant application was associated with lower Na under NaCl.
Association Biostimulant application was associated with higher P and Fe under NaHCO3.
Observation Biostimulant application increased total root length and surface.
Intervention effect Tablet plus PH increased fresh marketable yield by 15.5% relative to Tablet.
Intervention effect Tablet plus PH increased fresh marketable yield by 46.7% relative to untreated plants.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher K rates showed no evidence of decreasing hay or grain quality.

Taxon: oatsAvena sativat0
Treatment: Ke0
Outcome: hay or grain qualitye0
Direction: no evidencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“oats”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63

e0
“There was no evidence that higher rates of N or K decrease hay or grain quality.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–555

Title

Influence of N and K fertilisation on yield and quality of oats hay and grain in Western Australia.

Raj Malik; Blakely Paynter; R. J. Gilkes; et al. 2010

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Combined 80 kg/ha N and 100 kg/ha K gave the highest hay yield.
Intervention effect Combined 80 kg/ha N and 100 kg/ha K gave the highest grain yield.
Intervention effect Higher N rates showed no evidence of decreasing hay or grain quality.
Intervention effect K improved grain hectoliter weight more at higher N level.
Intervention effect K reduced grain screenings more at higher N level.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU treated fruit showed no firmness difference at 30+5.

Taxon: blueberryt0
Treatment: CPPU-treated-fruitt1
Outcome: differencee0
Direction: no differencee0
Qualifier: 30+5e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“but no difference at 30+5”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1454

t0
“blueberry”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–51

t1
“CPPU-treated-fruit had a slower decrease in firmness”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1401

Title

Repeated applications of CPPU on highbush blueberry cv. Duke increase yield and enhance fruit quality at harvest and during postharvest

Jorge B Retamales; Gustavo A Lobos; Sebastián Romero; et al. Chilean journal of agricultural research 2014. doi:10.4067/s0718-58392014000200005

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect In year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 3+17 DAFB raised yield 32.5% above control.
Intervention effect In year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 10 DAFB gave the highest fruit diameter.
Intervention effect In year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 3+17 DAFB gave the highest fruit diameter.
Intervention effect In year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 17 DAFB gave the highest soluble solids.
Intervention effect In year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 3+10+17 DAFB gave the highest soluble solids.
Recommendation For year one, 10 mL L -1 CPPU at 3+17 DAFB was judged the best treatment.
Intervention effect At 3+17 DAFB, soluble solids were similar to control.
Intervention effect At 3+17 DAFB, postharvest weight loss was similar to control.
Intervention effect In year two, 10 mL L -1 CPPU reduced fruit coloration.
Intervention effect In year two, 10 mL L -1 CPPU reduced soluble solids.
Intervention effect In year two, 10 mL L -1 CPPU did not reduce firmness at harvest.
Intervention effect At harvest, 10 mL L -1 CPPU increased berry weight by 24.2%.
Intervention effect At harvest, 10 mL L -1 CPPU increased fruit wax coverage by 59%.
Association Fruit wax coverage increased with CPPU rate at harvest and postharvest.
Intervention effect CPPU reduced fruit rotting to 15% at the 45+5 evaluation.
Intervention effect CPPU treated fruit had a slower firmness decrease at 30+1, with 30.5% less than control.
Intervention effect CPPU treated fruit usually had higher postharvest soluble solids.
Intervention effect 10 mL L -1 CPPU delayed color evolution at harvest and 30+1.
Intervention effect 10 mL L -1 CPPU did not delay color evolution at 30+5, 40+1 or 40+5.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vascular bundle integrity was not impaired by the double mutation.

Taxon: Brachypodium distachyonBrachypodium distachyont0
Organ / stage: vascular bundlese0
Outcome: integrity of vascular bundlese0
Direction: not impairede0

Verbatim

e0
“integrity of vascular bundles is not impaired”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–895

t0
“Brachypodium distachyon”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–70

Title

Inactivation of LACCASE8 and LACCASE5 genes in Brachypodium distachyon leads to severe decrease in lignin content and high increase in saccharification yield without impacting plant integrity

Philippe Le Bris; Yin Wang; Clément Barbereau; et al. Biotechnology for Biofuels 2019. doi:10.1186/s13068-019-1525-5

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Double laccase inactivation reduced mature culm lignin content by 20–30% versus wild type.
Intervention effect Double laccase inactivation increased saccharification yield by 140% versus wild type.
Intervention effect Ferulic acid release after mild alkaline hydrolysis was 2.5-fold higher in the double mutant.
Observation Interfascicular fibers were primarily affected by the double mutation.
Observation The double mutation had no drastic impact on plant growth.
Mechanism Two Brachypodium laccases were implicated in lignification.
Observation Interfascicular fiber and metaxylem cell lignification were partly uncoupled.
Recommendation Orthologs of these laccases were proposed as targets to improve grass biofuel feedstock.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no fruit quality change at final harvest.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: O 3 exposure at the vegetative stagee0
Outcome: fruit qualitye0
Direction: changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield or change in fruit quality at the final harvest”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–867

t0
“Tomato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18

Title

Recovery of Tomato Plants from Ozone Injury

Albert Z. Tenga; Beverley A. Marie; Douglas P. Ormrod HortScience 1990. doi:10.21273/hortsci.25.10.1230

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Ozone exposure caused visible leaf injury at either growth stage.
Intervention effect Ozone exposure reduced leaf area at either growth stage.
Intervention effect Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage ozone exposure progressively reduced fruit fresh weight.
Intervention effect Flowering-stage ozone exposure reduced fruit titratable acidity to a lesser degree.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying seaweed foliar fertilizers did not change soluble protein content of spinach and pakchoi.

Taxon: spinach and pakchoie3
Treatment: Spraying seaweed foliar fertilizerse3
Outcome: soluble protein contente3
Direction: not changee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“yield and quality of spinach and pakchoi”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–81

e3
“Spraying seaweed foliar fertilizers could remarkably increase the contents of soluble sugar and Vc,decrease nitrate content and not change soluble protein content in spinach and pakchoi”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1032

Title

Effects of seaweed foliar fertilizers on yield and quality of spinach and pakchoi

Cao Wei Turang feiliao 2011

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Eight seaweed foliar fertilizers increased spinach and pakchoi yields obviously, generally by over 10%.
Intervention effect Laminaria japonica slurry fertilizer increased spinach and pakchoi yield most obviously, followed by mannite and gibberellin foliar fertilizers.
Intervention effect Spraying seaweed foliar fertilizers could increase soluble sugar and Vc contents of spinach and pakchoi.
Intervention effect Spraying seaweed foliar fertilizers decreased nitrate content of spinach and pakchoi.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on copper contents in alfalfa.

Taxon: AlfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment: Spraying cobalt sulfatee2
Outcome: copper contentse3
Direction: no significant influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase dry grass yield of Alfalfa”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–480

e2
“Spraying cobalt sulfate could significantly increase cobalt and zinc contents,decrease boron and selenium contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–714

e3
“had no significant influence on molybdenum,iron,manganese and copper contents”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–796

Title

Effect of Spraying Cobalt Sulfate on the Yield and Absorption of Trace Elements in Alfalfa

Jie Xiao-lei Anhui nongye kexue 2007

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Spraying cobalt at 300 mg/kg gave the best increase in dry grass yield of alfalfa, 27.53% above clear water control.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased cobalt and zinc contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate decreased boron and selenium contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum, iron and manganese contents in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of cobalt, boron and iron in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate increased accumulation of manganese, copper and zinc in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Cobalt accumulation in alfalfa was highest at 600 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Accumulation of other trace elements in alfalfa was highest at 300 mg/kg cobalt application.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate significantly decreased the accumulation of selenium in alfalfa.
Intervention effect Spraying cobalt sulfate had no significant influence on molybdenum accumulation in alfalfa.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics