View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Twenty percent drought stress at alternate irrigation could significantly decrease cotton yield by 6% compared with the control treatment.
Treatment20% drought stress of existing irrigation practice at alternate irrigation (even) e1 Comparatorcontrol treatment e1 Verbatim
t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 e1 “20% drought stress of existing irrigation practice at alternate irrigation (even) could significantly decrease yield by 6% and reduce IWP by 5% as compared to control treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1644 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High ambient ozone caused a significant decrease in tomato fruit size over time.
TreatmentHigh ambient ozone e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Reduction of Tomato Fruit Size and Yield by Ozone1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 e2 “High ambient ozone depressed production and caused a significant decrease in fruit size over time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–558 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Dry-season irrigated rice yield in West Africa decrease s 15% with adaptation.
Outcomedecrease significantly less e0 Qualifierwith adaptation e0 Verbatim
e0 “with adaptation they would decrease significantly less (-15%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1274 t0 “rice production in Africa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–54 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Severe drought significantly decrease d yield .
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “siginificant decrease of the yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1281 t0 “Winter Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The end decrease stage was positively correlated with grain yield in 2019 dryland (r=0.56).
Directionhigher inferred e3 Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat growth dynamics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 e3 “The end decrease stage (EDS) was correlated with grain yield (r=0.56 in 2019 dryland, and r=0.53 in 2020 irrigated, p<0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1125 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The end decrease stage was positively correlated with grain yield in 2020 irrigated (r=0.53).
Directionhigher inferred e3 Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat growth dynamics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–89 e3 “The end decrease stage (EDS) was correlated with grain yield (r=0.56 in 2019 dryland, and r=0.53 in 2020 irrigated, p<0.001) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1125 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In 2015, all termination intervals reduced plant population, ear number and yield ; two days before planting had the greatest decrease .
Treatmentall termination intervals e0 Outcomeplant population, number of ears, and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In 2015, all termination intervals reduced plant population, number of ears, and yield (P = 0.01), with the 2-DBP treatment causing the biggest decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1113 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Only the largest climate change scenario produced a significant winter wheat yield decrease .
Treatmentclimate scenario with the largest change e0 Outcomewinter wheat yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “significant winter wheat yield decrease s were only observed for the climate scenario with the largest change ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–590 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Haymaking group yield decrease d 68–72% by the fourth year.
Verbatim
e0 “its significant decrease by 68–72% to the 4th year of utilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2082 t0 “SMOOTH BROME ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–37 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield decrease d significantly at the 12-day interval relative to four-day irrigation, with a reported decrease of 120.8%.
Treatment12-day irrigation interval e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield decrease d significantly at the 12-day irrigation interval with a decrease of 120.8% and 120.5% than the 4 and 8 irrigation treatments, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1496 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.