View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Common bean tolerated a water table at 15 cm or deeper without a significant yield decrease .
soil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper e0 without significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) could tolerate soil water table at depth of 15 cm or deeper without significant decrease in growth and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–973 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Jelica line 4 had no significant decrease in tuber yield under field conditions.
OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 e0 did not exhibit a significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the OCI/OCII Jelica line 4 did not exhibit a significant decrease in tuber yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1337 t0 “Phenotypic performance of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plants with pyramided rice cystatin genes (OCI and OCII) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Most sorghum varieties showed no significant decrease in yield .
most varieties e0 e1 do not exhibit a significant decrease e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Sorghum produces allelopathic compounds, including total phenolic compounds and sorgoleone, which exhibit a phytotoxic effect on weeds
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–134 e1 “The statistically insignificant results indicated that most varieties of sorghum plants do not exhibit a significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1572 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A reduced N rate did not significantly decrease seed yield under optimized rotation.
reduced N rate e0 without a significant/equivalent decrease e0 when the rotation was optimised e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A reduced N rate increased N-use efficiency and reduced the risk of high N surpluses without a significant/equivalent decrease of the seed yield when the rotation was optimised ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1757 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Replacing pre-winter ploughing with heavy harrowing gave a statistically insignificant spring wheat yield decrease of 7.1%.
heavy harrowing e1 pre-winter ploughing e1 Verbatim
e1 “replacing pre-winter ploughing with cultivatoring (B) or heavy harrowing (C) resulted in a statistically insignificant yield decrease , by 4.3 % and 7.1 % respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1311 e2 “Autumn tillage under spring wheat, cultivar Helia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–693 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Further raising the Prima sowing rate led to an insignificant yield decrease .
leaf mustard plants t0 further increase in the sowing rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A further increase in the sowing rate led to its insignificant decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1809–1881 t0 “leaf mustard plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–35 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result mixed not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Starch yield ranged from a 5.0% decrease to a 45.1% increase after grafting, without a significant difference.
Not reported Taxon Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The starch yield increased-5.0%-45.1%,the difference was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–672 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result positive not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield increased or did not significantly decrease despite reduced nitrogen for most crops.
cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas t0 grain yield (GYLD) e0 increased or did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Despite the apparent nitrogen reduction for most crops, grain yield (GYLD) and nitrogen accumulation in grain (NYLD) was increased or did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1216 t0 “cereal crops, winter oilseed rape and peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–90 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced K reduced yield of Guixiangzhan, but the decrease was not significant compared with conventional K.
conventional K e1 Verbatim
t0 “season rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 t1 “in South China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–111 e1 “Treatment with reduced K reduced yield ofGuixiangzhan,but the decrease was not significant compared to conventional K ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–916 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing nitrogen within 30 percent did not significantly decrease pepper yield .
reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “pepper in Greenhouse ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–96 e0 “the fields did not decrease significantly and the quality could be improved,the contents of VC and soluble sugar enhanced and the nitrate contents decrease d when reducing nitrogen fertilizer application within 30 percent. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–374 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Phaseolus vulgarise0
Solanum tuberosum
Sorghum_Brassica_napus_-_Habit.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Brassica napus
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa