View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain protein percentage did not decrease proportionally when grain yield per plant fell by 50% or more after defoliation at anthesis.
defoliation at anthesis e1 per cent grain protein e2 did not decrease proportionally e2 despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plant e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “defoliation at anthesis in barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes grown under pot culture and non limiting nitrogen conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 90–216 e2 “per cent grain protein did not decrease proportionally despite 50 % or more decrease in grain yield per plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–351 Other claims from this paper (2) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Low water stress can be allowed in wheat because it gives higher NUE with a non-significant decrease in yield .
low water stress can be allowed e3 non-significant decrease in yield e3 Verbatim
e3 “low water stress can be allowed which can result in higher NUE and non-significant decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–829 t0 “wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–53 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
M1 and M2 retained ear weight and grain yield per plant without notable decrease .
ear weight and grain yield per plant e0 did not notably decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The ear weight and grain yield per plant of M1 and M2 did not notably decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3196–3274 t0 “maize breeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–112 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Glycinebetaine application largely prevented the salt-related PSII quantum yield decrease .
glycinebetaine application e0 quantum yield of PSII e0 Verbatim
e0 “The quantum yield of PSII was decrease d by 27% under salt stress. This decrease was also largely prevented by glycinebetaine application. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–789 e1 “rice seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–37 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that supplemental lighting after sunset can compensate for yield decrease .
supplemental LED lighting after sunset e0 Verbatim
e0 “Applying supplemental LED lighting after sunset can compensate for the yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1582 t0 “Green Onion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–42 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Melatonin alleviated the decrease in quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion in PS II under chilling stress.
quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion e1 alleviation of the decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “effects of melatonin on photoinhibition under chilling stress in cucumber seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 42–125 e1 “alleviation of the decrease in quantum yield of photochemical energy conversion ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1045 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
After drought, the grain yield decrease of three wheat hybrids was about 20% lower than in three wheat lines.
grain yield decrease e0 three wheat lines e0 Verbatim
e0 “After drought, the grain yield decrease of three hybrids was about 20% lower compared to three wheat lines analyzed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–407 t0 “bread wheat under summer drought events ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–77 Other claims from this paper (4) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Variable-rate fertiliser application is expected to increase sunflower yield and quality and decrease fertilisation cost and environmental effects.
Fertiliser application with spatial variable rate e3 will increase yield, quality and decrease fertilisation cost and environmental effects e3 Verbatim
t0 “Determination of Spatial Variability in Sunflower Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–60 e3 “Fertiliser application with spatial variable rate will increase yield , quality and decrease fertilisation cost and environmental effects ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2063 Other claims from this paper (18) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Straw returning decrease maize ET.
Straw returning e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Straw returning could decrease ET and increase the water use efficiency( WUE) and yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–927 t0 “summer maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–104 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect Straw returning significantly decreased soil evaporation, especially early. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected water consumption, leaf water use efficiency, whole-period water use efficiency and yield. Observation Straw returning and water supply significantly affected photosynthetic parameters. Observation The straw returning and water supply interaction significantly affected photosynthetic parameters with an exception for net photosynthetic rate and yield. Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize water use efficiency( WUE). Intervention effect Straw returning increase maize yield. Association Increasing water supply increased maize Yield. Association Increasing water supply decreased maize WUE. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize WUE by 35. 32% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize WUE by 33. 74% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize WUE by 51. 88% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize WUE by 29. 69% relative to non-straw returning. Intervention effect At water supply level 1, straw returning increased maize yield by 7. 61%. Intervention effect At water supply level 2, straw returning increased maize yield by 8. 94%. Intervention effect At water supply level 3, straw returning increased maize yield by 18. 29%. Intervention effect At water supply level 4, straw returning increased maize yield by 6. 96%. Observation Straw returning with 70% field soil water capacity supply performed best jointly for ET, yield and WUE. Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Frequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha-1 sewage sludge can decrease CO2 emissions per unit yield in silage maize.
frequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha −1 doses of sewage sludge e5 decrease CO 2 emissions per unit yield e5 Verbatim
e5 “frequent irrigation with 30 and 60 Mg ha −1 doses of sewage sludge can decrease CO 2 emissions per unit yield in silage maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1479 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree1
Triticum aestivum
Zea mays
Oryza sativa
Cucumis sativus
Helianthus annuus